loraward Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 One. Make all local pro football teams play at least five players born within 20 miles of the club. Two . Make all school children go to a local school that can be reached within a 30 minute walk [saving millions on unnecessary travel and fuel. Three any one using a mobile phone when driving would be sentenced to 12 months in prison without time out for good behaviour . I would extend your first, the rest must have lived in the area for at least ten years. Your second to include public sector employees. And add. Private sector employers should employ the person living closest to the workplace as long as they are suitable for the job. So if they short list 5 and they are all suitable, the closest and not the best should be employed. The government should be duty bound to provide everyone in need of money, with a job that pays the amount they need. ---------- Post added 10-06-2015 at 09:01 ---------- And when would they actually SEEK a job? 168 hours in a week - 30 - 56 for sleep = 82 which can be used for looking for work and leisure. ---------- Post added 10-06-2015 at 09:04 ---------- Just coincidence that everywhere that has ever tried to control religion and personal belief happens to be run by an evil dictator and are the worst possible places on the planet to live. I think not. But unable to actually seek work. Which is what we want them to do, since it's job SEEKERS allowance. North Korea is one of the 'the happiest places on Earth' while U.S. is the lowest. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393478/North-Korea-rated-the-happiest-places-Earth-survey--North-Korea.html#ixzz3ce0kRF2U Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattleonard Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Makes moving heavy/large items nearly impossible then... Also practically unenforceable. Indeed. If they did somehow find a way to enforce it, then it would just result in an increase in driving due to people taking more round-about routes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 North Korea is one of the 'the happiest places on Earth' while U.S. is the lowest. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393478/North-Korea-rated-the-happiest-places-Earth-survey--North-Korea.html#ixzz3ce0kRF2U t's official, North Korea is one of the 'the happiest places' to live in the world, but only according to country's own regime. Yes, that's why North Koreans regularly risk being shot in order to escape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattleonard Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I would extend your first, the rest must have lived in the area for at least ten years. Your second to include public sector employees. And add. Private sector employers should employ the person living closest to the workplace as long as they are suitable for the job. So if they short list 5 and they are all suitable, the closest and not the best should be employed. The government should be duty bound to provide everyone in need of money, with a job that pays the amount they need. ---------- Post added 10-06-2015 at 09:01 ---------- 168 hours in a week - 30 - 56 for sleep = 82 which can be used for looking for work and leisure. ---------- Post added 10-06-2015 at 09:04 ---------- North Korea is one of the 'the happiest places on Earth' while U.S. is the lowest. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393478/North-Korea-rated-the-happiest-places-Earth-survey--North-Korea.html#ixzz3ce0kRF2U Wow - you really do want to implement a proper communist state, don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRocketMan Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 Wow - you really do want to implement a proper communist state, don't you? Communism isnt that bad..........the Chinese love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loraward Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Wow - you really do want to implement a proper communist state, don't you? communism A system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. No but it doesn't sound that bad, I wouldn't stop individuals from owning property, but I would stop them owning substantially more property than they need if owning it impacts adversely on other members of the community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryedo40 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 1) A strict separation of religion from government. Religion should be a personal matter - and government should play no part in promoting, funding, privileging or favouring one religion above another. e.g. just because MPs may like playing golf, doesn't mean everyone should be forced to play golf. Neither does it mean golfers and golfing institutions should be given tax breaks and special privileges in society while non-golf players are denied those same rights and privileges. Same for religion. 2) An end to faith schools and coerced/forced worship in schools. Schools should be secular and play no part in indoctrinating children with divisive and sectarian religious beliefs. 3) Ban hard-plastic-sealed packaging. Pain in the backside to get into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 North Korea is one of the 'the happiest places on Earth' while U.S. is the lowest. No wonder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRocketMan Posted June 14, 2015 Author Share Posted June 14, 2015 A new law.......... People on benefits cannot get married or be granted a marriage license. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3123350/Benefits-couple-say-thank-taxpayer-footing-bill-5-000-wedding-want-government-fund-luxury-Malaysia-honeymoon-too.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 A new law.......... People on benefits cannot get married or be granted a marriage license. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3123350/Benefits-couple-say-thank-taxpayer-footing-bill-5-000-wedding-want-government-fund-luxury-Malaysia-honeymoon-too.html Does that include people who claim child benefit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now