Jump to content

EU Referendum - How will you vote?


Do you think that the UK should remain a member of the EU?  

530 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think that the UK should remain a member of the EU?

    • YES
      169
    • NO
      361


Recommended Posts

That would explain it. Thanks!

 

Sorry to hear that. I obviously have a different viewpoint on the referendum but I'm genuinely sorry you couldn't take part. The more people who vote the better IMO, no matter what their choice is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that. I obviously have a different viewpoint on the referendum but I'm genuinely sorry you couldn't take part. The more people who vote the better IMO, no matter what their choice is.

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.politico.eu/article/full-text-of-deal-changing-britain-eu-membership-brexit-referendum/

 

Theres the document. Make up your own minds on Section C. It's as plain as legalese ever gets that it is worthless to anyone who can actually read.

 

S.C Part 1, para 2,3

 

You know the bits where they say that.

 

You either have appalling reading comprehension or are just being deliberately obtuse again.

Section C, Art.1, paras 1 to 3:

1. It is recognised that the United Kingdom, in the light of the specific situation it has under the Treaties, is not committed to further political integration into the European Union. The substance of this will be incorporated into the Treaties at the time of their next revision in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Treaties and the respective constitutional requirements of the Member States, so as to make it clear that the references to ever closer union do not apply to the United Kingdom.

 

The references in the Treaties and their preambles to the process of creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe do not offer a legal basis for extending the scope of any provision of the Treaties or of EU secondary legislation. They should not be used either to support an extensive interpretation of the competences of the Union or of the powers of its institutions as set out in the Treaties.

 

These references do not alter the limits of Union competence governed by the principle of conferral, or the use of Union competence governed by the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. They do not require that further competences be conferred upon the European Union or that the European Union must exercise its existing competences, or that competences conferred on the Union could not be reduced and thereby returned to the Member States.

And overleaf, following 2 paras:
The competences conferred by the Member States on the Union can be modified, whether to increase or reduce them, only through a revision of the Treaties with the agreement of all Member States. The Treaties already contain specific provisions whereby some Member States are entitled not to take part in or are exempted from the application of certain provisions of Union law. The references to an ever closer union among the peoples are therefore compatible with different paths of integration being available for different Member States and do not compel all Member States to aim for a common destination.

 

The Treaties allow an evolution towards a deeper degree of integration among the Member States that share such a vision of their common future, without this applying to other Member States.

So, in standard speak,
  • para 1: the UK does not go into ever close union, and the next Treaty iteration will incorporate that in black and white.
  • para 2: ever closer union is not a legally binding principle under which Treaty or Directives ('secondary legislation') can be extended in scope.
  • para 3: ever closer union is not a legally binding principle under which new EU competences can be drawn, or existing EU competences expanded or withdrawn (where such competences are conferred by Treaty in the first place)
  • para 4: expands on (3) by reminding that competences only arise under Treaty with the consent of all EU member states, and on (1) by stating that it is permissible for EU member states to make their own way at their own speed.
  • para 5: those EU member states who want closer union can go for it without bothering those EU member states who don't.

 

Where's the controversy here? :huh:

Edited by L00b
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they changed the registration system to per person from per house, and to do that everyone had to re-register at some point?

 

i didn't re register just got a card as usual, did you get a voting card

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all. Glad to see that the majority of Sheffield Forum users are sensible enough to vote out (by the looks of this poll). I really cannot understand how someone would want to stay in the EU and be dictated to by unelected beaurocrats in Brussels (and the Germans). I voted out 1st thing this morning with great pride. I have been looking forward to an opportunity to cast my vote for years. I really do hope that we leave the failing EU as soon as possible. If we do not leave, our children will despise us, and ask us why we did not take this (probably last) chance. Cheers.

 

According to the spiel at the bottom of the homepage this forum has over 188,000 members of those 524 have expressed an opinion if those percentages are reflected locally or nationally it would frankly be astonishing.my thirteen year old daughters school did a mock referendum the result was 35/65 to stay whilst this again cannot be taken as how the vote will go it shows me that the next generations may not be as sceptical about the European Union as uou seem to think they are.cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all. Glad to see that the majority of Sheffield Forum users are sensible enough to vote out (by the looks of this poll). I really cannot understand how someone would want to stay in the EU and be dictated to by unelected beaurocrats in Brussels (and the Germans). I voted out 1st thing this morning with great pride. I have been looking forward to an opportunity to cast my vote for years. I really do hope that we leave the failing EU as soon as possible. If we do not leave, our children will despise us, and ask us why we did not take this (probably last) chance. Cheers.

 

Maybe you dont understand because you dont know anything about it beyond rumour and made up myths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25% of the NHS workforce are immigrants. So if vote leavers are voting on this basis, they're destroying the NHS that the leave camp have promised another £100 million per week funding.

 

what fraction are EU migrants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't re register just got a card as usual, did you get a voting card

 

About 85% of previously registered people will have been auto-enrolled onto the new register. the other 15% weren't because of data issues.

 

DWP datasets have all kinds of quality issues. Wrong dates of birth. Names spelt incorrectly. Incorrect addresses. NI numbers shared by two different people. People with multiple NI numbers.

 

The government seem to be admitting they potentially have incorrect details for up to 7 million people who were on the electoral register in 2015.

 

An aside but it is definitely worth requesting a record of your NI contributions if you are one of the people who couldn't be verified. Mine were correct thankfully but I was a bit nervous for a while. It felt like I'd been paying into a savings account for 31 years and didn't know how much was in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil wrote he'd said its in Britains interests to leave. He hasn't written that.

 

'Should voters across the UK (especially after the way Greece was treated last summer) not vote in favour of LEAVE as an important step in reclaiming their Parliament’s sovereignty and their democracy?'

 

Answer: No.

 

From the conclusion:

'To do this, on 23rd June the British public must shun the lazy choice of LEAVE. They must vote STAY and work, from 24th June onwards, towards electing a government that can bring about the changes the EU must undergo on behalf of its peoples.'

 

The 'never wrong' unbeliever will obviously disagree with the last paragraph being possible. But Yanis has more of a clue.

 

 

we know know after Jonker outburt there will be no change

 

---------- Post added 23-06-2016 at 20:49 ----------

 

So you want disruption and division across Europe?

We just went through major depression and longest peacetime period in history. And you want to plunge us back into recession and instability without a friend?

 

 

Talk sense man. :confused:

 

the division is already there, it,s just that we have been given a chance to vote on it. Millions of people in the EU want out of the dictatorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is simply describing the current situation. Paragraphs 4 & 5 clarify that Cameron's agreement is compatible with the existing treaties.

 

You are reading something that isn't there.

 

Just clearly explain what you think the problem is with paragraphs 2 & 3.

 

The whole thing simply describes the current situation thats the whole bloody point. Its an opt out from nothing. Ever closer union never had any legal validity as affirmed by the document and we now have an opt out from something which never had any validity. Ie.we have been given precisely nothing. People like you must put a grin on the faces on conmen like CMD and Juncker when you are so easy to bamboozle even when the con is pointed out to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.