flamingjimmy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) A 2015 Satnav have people driving into rivers, Off bridges etc …. And you think a calculator put man on the moon in 69 ?!? Yes. Really, of all the complaints that conspiracy theorists have this is one of the stupidest I've ever come across. You can even download some of the computer code that NASA actually used for yourself, some is available to the public if you want to go find it. Edited July 22, 2015 by flamingjimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 The probability that the moon landings were fake is zero. Anybody want to argue? The moon landings taking place is as certain as global warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code word Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 As I said in previous posts all a calculator is good for is typing the words boobs. That was its biggest trick! And no way put man on the moon in 69... Even today it could not put man on the moon! ---------- Post added 23-07-2015 at 00:23 ---------- Lets go to mars, Let me get my calculator out to safely get us to mars and back?? UhHu ---------- Post added 23-07-2015 at 00:26 ---------- Ah … But this is not a 69 calculator this is a 2015 scientific calculator !! Yip that makes a difference!. A new 2015 scientific calculator of today still cant put man on the moon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 As I said in previous posts all a calculator is good for is typing the words boobs. That was its biggest trick! And no way put man on the moon in 69... Even today it could not put man on the moon! It wasn't a calculator they used, but a computer with less computing power than a modern day calculator. Here's your calculator. Also, if you really think the biggest trick you can do with a calculator is spell the word boobs then perhaps you should just leave rocket science to others. How come it's taken you to come out and say 'they couldn't do it with just a calculator'? Why are there no computer scientists who agree with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code word Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 "It wasn't a calculator they used, but a computer with less computing power than a modern day calculator." So it could not even make the word boobs?? It had less power?!? Ok You make this easy for me!. Keep going! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) "It wasn't a calculator they used, but a computer with less computing power than a modern day calculator." So it could not even make the word boobs?? I don't know whether it could project the word boobs onto a screen. I do know it could get men to the moon. 's a video with some interviews with the people who literally wrote the code. Edited July 22, 2015 by flamingjimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code word Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Then Why is NASA Stumped by This? It is all about debate some believe some don’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Then Why is NASA Stumped by This? Oh, changing the subject, that's cool I'll follow along and respond to this, but first: Just to clarify, you're now dropping your stupid objections about how they couldn't do it because of some silly thing you heard about a calculator (haha boobs)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code word Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 I don't know whether it could project the word boobs onto a screen. I do know it could get men to the moon. 's a video with some interviews with the people who literally wrote the code. If it's scientific: (.)(.) (boobs) if not: boob - 8008 Turn it upside down. ---------- Post added 23-07-2015 at 00:43 ---------- Add a 5 if you like! ---------- Post added 23-07-2015 at 00:50 ---------- flamingjimmy A few more for you when at school. hello - 0.7734 hell - 77e4 go to hell - 7734206 hedgehog - 60436034 heel - 7334 eloise (name) - 351073 shell oil - 710.77345 hate (h8) - 84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Oh, changing the subject, that's cool I'll follow along and respond to this, but first: Just to clarify, you're now dropping your stupid objections about how they couldn't do it because of some silly thing you heard about a calculator (haha boobs)? If it's scientific: (.)(.) (boobs) if not: boob - 8008 Turn it upside down. I'll take that as 'yes, I am dropping my stupid objections and I'm sorry for wasting your time' It's ok I forgive you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now