JIbbo Posted March 30, 2010 Author Share Posted March 30, 2010 As I have repeatedly shown, there has been warming over the last decade and the models of climate change have been remarkably accurate. http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm No there hasn't. not a single link on there is from 1998 to 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 As I have repeatedly shown, there has been warming over the last decade and the models of climate change have been remarkably accurate. http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm Did it predict a cold winter? Not just a cold winter but the coldest for 30 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JIbbo Posted March 30, 2010 Author Share Posted March 30, 2010 As I have repeatedly shown, there has been warming over the last decade and the models of climate change have been remarkably accurate. http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-models.htm http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/uah_jun09.png Some warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/uah_jun09.png Some warming. Wildcat doesn't like that site....it may be biased... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonBennet Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 You prove yourself wrong and then boldly assert you were right ... So much for backing opinions up with facts What? Where have I proved myself wrong? I stated that http://www.skepticalscience.com is run by a man who is an enthusiastic amateur who freely admits he is not a scientist. I also stated that you have not been able to link to any CREDIBLE sources for your view that global warming exists and is man made. Even you agree the first statement is right. If you can prove the second statement wrong please do so. But you've made hundreds of posts on this thread so far and have yet to offer any concrete proof so I won't hold my breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berberis Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 As show by this thread you cannot argue with a global warming apostle. They will not accept anything that is contrary to their point of view. Just be humble in the knowledge when in 10-20 years when the next end of the world story breaks that you where right about global warming and the likes of Wildcat are now dressing in their pyjamas, wearing monster feet slippers and arguing with a letterbox somewhere in east Croydon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 Global warming alarmists are now alarmed because they cannot account for the cooling trend that has been evident since the late 1990s in contradiction to their climate models. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests the planet has entered a cooling cycle that could persist for decades. http://biggovernment.com/kmooney/2010/03/29/climategate-shows-big-science-in-its-natural-state/ Another obviously rubbish article. If the person was trying to give a balanced view of what for example Trenbirth was talking about then instead of simply repeating the misrepresentation of his views popularised by bloggers quote mining the CRU emails he would have mentioned Trenbirth's response: http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_14167354 The omission shows the journalist is not interested in truth, just in telling a story that he thinks people want to hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 What? Where have I proved myself wrong? I stated that http://www.skepticalscience.com is run by a man who is an enthusiastic amateur who freely admits he is not a scientist. I also stated that you have not been able to link to any CREDIBLE sources for your view that global warming exists and is man made. Even you agree the first statement is right. If you can prove the second statement wrong please do so. But you've made hundreds of posts on this thread so far and have yet to offer any concrete proof so I won't hold my breath. He is a scientist as you yourself showed with your quotation having majored in Solar Physics. I have linked to loads of peer reviewed papers. You know that and everyone else knows that. I don't have time to play stupid play ground games with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonBennet Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 He is a scientist as you yourself showed with your quotation having majored in Solar Physics. I have linked to hundreds of peer reviewed papers. You know that and everyone else knows that. I don't have time to play stupid play ground games with you. And there go the toys out of the pram! No proof, just a silly little man with an agenda and too much time on his hands spouting garbage on a subject he knows nothing about! I think now we've proved Wildcat wrong this thread can now be closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 Wildcat doesn't like that site....it may be biased... Just a little, he fabricates evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now