retep Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The last decade was warmer than the previous decade and the 10 warmest years on record all occurred after 1998 with 2010 and 2005 ranking as the hottest years on record, all this at a time when the sun had lower solar activity. Not bad for a climate that you claim isn't warming. "Leaked draft of climate report struggles with drop in warming" Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/08/20/leaked-draft-climate-report-struggles-with-drop-in-warming/#ixzz2cgrcTbGr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 "Leaked draft of climate report struggles with drop in warming" Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/08/20/leaked-draft-climate-report-struggles-with-drop-in-warming/#ixzz2cgrcTbGr I dont even need to open that link, it is Fox News. http://www.foxnews.com/weather/2013/08/06/2012-shows-climate-change-with-record-sea-level-rise-arctic-melting-heated-up/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 (edited) "Leaked draft of climate report struggles with drop in warming" Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/08/20/leaked-draft-climate-report-struggles-with-drop-in-warming/#ixzz2cgrcTbGr And then goes on to say "that scientists are now 95 percent certain that man’s actions are responsible for global warming, and that action is key to avert a coming crises". It doesn't take a genius to conclude that there will be times when natural phenomenon are opposing AGW. Edited August 22, 2013 by angos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 And then goes on to say "that scientists are now 95 percent certain that man’s actions are responsible for global warming, and that action is key to avert a coming crises". It doesn't take a genius to conclude that there will be times when natural phenomenon are opposing AGW. And you believe them? It doesn't take a genius to know when the public are being screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 And you believe them? It doesn't take a genius to know when the public are being screwed. I don't take a great deal of notice of them to be honest, but its sensible to conclude that 7 billion people living on the planet and destroying vast swaths of it, as well as burning carbon based fossil fuels that have been locked away for millions of years must be having an adverse affect on it, the science just happens to support my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I don't take a great deal of notice of them to be honest, but its sensible to conclude that 7 billion people living on the planet and destroying vast swaths of it, as well as burning carbon based fossil fuels that have been locked away for millions of years must be having an adverse affect on it, the science just happens to support my opinion. Then you'd have thought they would concentrate on a way to reduce the population, seems there's no profit/fiddle in that, nature will take its course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Then you'd have thought they would concentrate on a way to reduce the population, seems there's no profit/fiddle in that, nature will take its course. I think most people would find the cost of clean renewable energy more palatable than population reduction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think most people would find the cost of clean renewable energy more palatable than population reduction. The thing that is holding back the debate about population control, is that they cannot find any politicains with the balls to speak the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think most people would find the cost of clean renewable energy more palatable than population reduction. They will eventually, they'll be eating each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The latest from the experts is we don't have a clue, we'll blame it on humans, that should keep the money rolling in. Yes. Alleging Global Warming is a very good source of evidence- for gaining Grants! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now