Jump to content

Am I still allowed to question climate change?


Recommended Posts

180 pages?! No thanks, I'd rather not read the whole thread, thanks.

 

What have scientists got to gain by concluding that man made climate change is real?

Compare that to what some scientists and other critics have got to gain, or lose by concluding that we are accelerating the effects of climate change.

 

Some of them have ongoing funding to gain.

 

---------- Post added 12-12-2014 at 11:08 ----------

 

As governments see man-made climate change as a cash cow, I wonder what would happen to anyone's funding who proved, and published, that it was a falsehood?

 

Fortunately most science is beyond the direct manipulation of politicians, unless you're going for some really involved conspiracy theories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Some of them have ongoing funding to gain.

 

---------- Post added 12-12-2014 at 11:08 ----------

 

 

Fortunately most science is beyond the direct manipulation of politicians, unless you're going for some really involved conspiracy theories.

 

Conspiracy theories?

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11367272/Climategate-the-sequel-How-we-are-STILL-being-tricked-with-flawed-data-on-global-warming.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those people who's brain begins to hurt when reading the conflicting arguments of climate change why not

look at the glacier evidence, here is one such site, alternatively enter 'Climate change Glacier evidence' or

something similar into your favourite search engine:

 

http://www.nps.gov/olym/naturescience/glaciers.htm

 

Or alternately,

"Some glaciers on Asia's Karakoram mountains are defying the global trend and getting thicker, say researchers."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17701677

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A handful of glaciers are getting thicker - the vast majority are receding.

 

I don't think anyone has claimed global warming is uniform.

 

Then how can you put it down to global warming, a bit like saying the living room is hot but the whole house is cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As governments see man-made climate change as a cash cow, I wonder what would happen to anyone's funding who proved, and published, that it was a falsehood?

 

Green taxes add up to less than 3% of total Government taxes, so the big deal about Green taxes is just a tabloid headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then how can you put it down to global warming, a bit like saying the living room is hot but the whole house is cold.

 

No - like saying the whole house is warming up apart from the attic.

 

But the earths weather systems are far more complex than a house - warming isn't happening in a uniform manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No - like saying the whole house is warming up apart from the attic.

 

But the earths weather systems are far more complex than a house - warming isn't happening in a uniform manner.

 

Have you been up in the attic for the last 18 years,

 

"Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues"

 

 

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.