Am I still allowed to question climate change?

[Obelix]

And I bet if you had something that supported your view you'd hail it as 100% proof and the end of the debate...

[Jeffrey Shaw]

And I bet if you had something that supported your view you'd hail it as 100% proof and the end of the debate...

Such debates never end. You already know that. And nor do they convince anyone, in most situations!

[Obelix]

I'm sorry but the debate on AGW is effectively closed as to the source of it already. It'll take some stunning evidence to prove it's false at this point, all that most people are looking at is the magnitude of it.

[El Cid]

I'm sorry but the debate on AGW is effectively closed as to the source of it already. It'll take some stunning evidence to prove it's false at this point, all that most people are looking at is the magnitude of it.

 

Of course the debate is closed.

 

Those that cannot believe in climate change dont have an alternative.

 

We believe the temperatures are rising, the effect of that are melting ice and rising sea levels.

 

We do not hear of alternative causes, it is not the Sun, it is not Moon; the only suspected cause of this warming is the greenhouse effect. People try to play the man instead of the ball.

 

Its always been clear that the earth continued to warm, because the sea level continued to rise.

[unbeliever]

It's not a question of true or false. It's about the sign and magnitude of the net effect of all the feedbacks.

The question is the CO2 sensitivity of the system.

I have explained this in great detail on multiple occasions.

[little malc]

climate change is happening but what is not so clear, how much or any is down to mankind or is it cyclical as it's always been?

[Robin-H]

climate change is happening but what is not so clear, how much or any is down to mankind or is it cyclical as it's always been?

 

Is that unclear? The fact that the warming is anthropogenic is pretty much proven is it not?

 

There is no natural cycle that the current warming would fit into, so not only is the science behind the warming proven, but there is no reasonable alternative.

[tinfoilhat]

Is that unclear? The fact that the warming is anthropogenic is pretty much proven is it not?

 

There is no natural cycle that the current warming would fit into, so not only is the science behind the warming proven, but there is no reasonable alternative.

 

I understand a big spike occured with the industrial revolution (saw it on natgeo) and it's still going. Coincidence?

[BHRemovals]

Theresa may is a denyer.

[unbeliever]

Is that unclear? The fact that the warming is anthropogenic is pretty much proven is it not?

 

There is no natural cycle that the current warming would fit into, so not only is the science behind the warming proven, but there is no reasonable alternative.

 

That doesn't preclude a non-anthropogenic component.