Cyclone Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 There are no staff available to work any more hours, so how do you suggest that "more" is done with the same resource. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 If existing NHS staff's hours of work were reorganised to include weekends- without the total hours worked being increased- fewer people would suffer; and many avoidable deaths/injuries would be avoided. Not only that; by improving use of equipment and facilities, so as to ensure less downtime, other savings might accrue. If people need the NHS at weekends and the need is non-elective, why refuse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daven Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) If existing NHS staff's hours of work were reorganised to include weekends- without the total hours worked being increased- fewer people would suffer; and many avoidable deaths/injuries would be avoided. Not only that; by improving use of equipment and facilities, so as to ensure less downtime, other savings might accrue. If people need the NHS at weekends and the need is non-elective, why refuse? I'm not sure how that will work as the resources will be spread more thinly during the week to cover the weekend - there isn't an infinite amount of resources. Staff will need days off in the week to cover the weekends so there will be less staff during the week. If people need the NHS and the need is non-elective i.e., urgent or emergency at weekends the resources are already there . Edited September 10, 2015 by Daven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted September 11, 2015 Share Posted September 11, 2015 I'm not sure how that will work as the resources will be spread more thinly during the week to cover the weekend - there isn't an infinite amount of resources. True- except that fixed resources (buildings, machinery, plant etc.) would be better utilised: a saving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratter71 Posted September 11, 2015 Share Posted September 11, 2015 True- except that fixed resources (buildings, machinery, plant etc.) would be better utilised: a saving. Not necessarily true, as an example a recent report on the news focused on having a consultant general surgeon on site 24/7. At the moment there may be a consultant on call, possibly with a reg or F2 on site. There isnt the demand for emergency general surgery to keep a consultant busy 24/7, so they would need to do elective work to utilise the staff & fixed resources. Would you like to attend for your elective hernia op at half past eight on Saturday night, or have your piles tied at 0300 hrs on a Sunday? I cant see many people opting for elective stuff at unsocial hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtkate Posted September 11, 2015 Share Posted September 11, 2015 Would you like to attend for your elective hernia op at half past eight on Saturday night, or have your piles tied at 0300 hrs on a Sunday? I cant see many people opting for elective stuff at unsocial hours. If the choice was have it at 3am this Wednesday or wait 3 months I think that might change a lot of people's mind. The NHS will only work if both it and it's patients change. Patients need to start being more flexible too where they can but doctors needs to reciprocate. Full 24/7 working is just the start. We need to utilise technology to reduce the strain on NHS resources. So many people just do not need to see a doctor and could use Skype calling or automated health checkers (a step further than say those blood sugar checkers diabetics can use) that will instantly ping a doctor if your condition needs checking up on etc. Currently we seem to be treading water and slowly sinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted September 11, 2015 Share Posted September 11, 2015 Surgery is avoided after midnight, unless there is serious risk of harm if the surgery is not performed, due to morbidity rates increasing. ---------- Post added 11-09-2015 at 16:19 ---------- True- except that fixed resources (buildings, machinery, plant etc.) would be better utilised: a saving. There would also be higher costs of using the facilities such electricity, added wear and tear etc as well as cost of the extra consumables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted September 12, 2015 Author Share Posted September 12, 2015 Surgery is avoided after midnight, unless there is serious risk of harm if the surgery is not performed, due to morbidity rates increasing. Because consultants are in bed instead of in theatre, leaving junior doctors to do work that they shouldn't be doing. There would also be higher costs of using the facilities such electricity, added wear and tear etc as well as cost of the extra consumables. That is pennies compared to slashing the cost of building new facilities that stand unused, buying equipment that sits unused. The surplus property can be sold off to reinvest in patient care. Poor utilisation is a serious problem in government services and its being dealt with in many areas but the people in the NHS seems to think that it should be exempt from ordinary efficiencies. There was good news yesterday though. The BMA has finally conceded and they are going to negotiate moving to a 7 day NHS. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34217248 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 (edited) Because consultants are in bed instead of in theatre, leaving junior doctors to do work that they shouldn't be doing. Rubbish, if you bothered to look you'd notice that there are clear guidelines about who should be in theatre during specific cases. ---------- Post added 12-09-2015 at 15:35 ---------- That is pennies compared to slashing the cost of building new facilities that stand unused, buying equipment that sits unused. The surplus property can be sold off to reinvest in patient care. Poor utilisation is a serious problem in government services and its being dealt with in many areas but the people in the NHS seems to think that it should be exempt from ordinary efficiencies. There was good news yesterday though. The BMA has finally conceded and they are going to negotiate moving to a 7 day NHS. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34217248 So, when you consider that the hospital trusts receive a payment for each operation that they carry out, where is the money going to come from to fund the extra operations that will be carried out during the weekend? Edited September 12, 2015 by JFKvsNixon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berberis Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 The Doctor that told you that there were 5 doctors on duty for the whole hospital was talking rubbish! However, any shortages of staff on duty at the night has got nothing to do with people not wanting to work the shifts, but due to the trusts cutting back on costs. OK so how do you know this? I spoke to the doctor, face to face. Did you? Were you on duty at the same time in the Norther General when he told me this. If so, when was it? What day and at what time? Lets compare. ---------- Post added 12-09-2015 at 15:39 ---------- There are no staff available to work any more hours, so how do you suggest that "more" is done with the same resource. 20 operations to be carried out in a 5 day block need the same number of staff as 20 operations carried out in a 7 day block. The maths is simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now