hackey lad Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 3 hours ago, hackey lad said: So you believe me now ? Any answer ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peak4 Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 4 hours ago, Organgrinder said: Details then ? WHEN WAS SHE GIVEN MILLIONS, AND HOW MANY WEEKS LATER DID IT GO BUST ? That's what I asked him because he invariably doesn't know. Do you ? 4 hours ago, hackey lad said: I do know , it’s a fact and on public record . Weeks after being given 3 million by the Government , the charity folded . Nothing wrong with my reading . I think the question needs re-reading, with the correct emphasis; WHEN WAS SHE GIVEN MILLIONS, AND HOW MANY WEEKS LATER DID IT GO BUST ? Since you refer to the £3,000,000 then "SHE" wasn't given it. Indeed, it looks like it was a condition that she was asked to step down from her role in order for the charity to receive the money, which would also release a similar sum from a different source. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/03/camila-batmanghelidjh-to-leave-kids-company See also https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/06/kids-company-closure-government-knew-3m-grant-pay-staff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 (edited) 11 minutes ago, peak4 said: I think the question needs re-reading, with the correct emphasis; WHEN WAS SHE GIVEN MILLIONS, AND HOW MANY WEEKS LATER DID IT GO BUST ? Since you refer to the £3,000,000 then "SHE" wasn't given it. Indeed, it looks like it was a condition that she was asked to step down from her role in order for the charity to receive the money, which would also release a similar sum from a different source. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/03/camila-batmanghelidjh-to-leave-kids-company See also https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/06/kids-company-closure-government-knew-3m-grant-pay-staff It doesn’t need re reading. I never said she was given it . The charity she was boss of , that she was in charge of , which had received many, many millions of government money , was given it . Edited January 3 by hackey lad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 3 Share Posted January 3 Just now, hackey lad said: It doesn’t need re reading. If it doesn't need re-reading then it needs you to understand what you've read instead. He's making the point that SHE WAS NOT GIVEN MILLIONS - IT WAS GIVEN TO THE CHARITY WHEN SHE AGREED TO STEP DOWN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, hackey lad said: It doesn’t need re reading. I never said she was given it . The charity she was boss of , that she was in charge of , which had received many, many millions of government money , was given it . You are correct, of course. That money was her responsibility. Now, do you have any comment about the £400 000 000 000+ that has disappeared from the public purse, on the Tory Government’s watch, in the last five years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, Prettytom said: You are correct, of course. That money was her responsibility. Now, do you have any comment about the £400 000 000 000+ that has disappeared from the public purse, on the Tory Government’s watch, in the last five years? Ahhhh a nice piece of whataboutary right there 👌 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, The_DADDY said: Ahhhh a nice piece of whataboutary right there 👌 Fully expected. 5 minutes ago, Organgrinder said: If it doesn't need re-reading then it needs you to understand what you've read instead. He's making the point that SHE WAS NOT GIVEN MILLIONS - IT WAS GIVEN TO THE CHARITY WHEN SHE AGREED TO STEP DOWN. I know what point he’s making . While you’re here , do you believe me now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prettytom Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: Ahhhh a nice piece of whataboutary right there 👌 Absolutely not. Its a very fair question. I wasn’t expecting Hackey to be able to answer it though. Seems I was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Prettytom said: Absolutely not. Its a very fair question. I wasn’t expecting Hackey to be able to answer it though. Seems I was right. Hackey could answer it , if it was on the correct thread . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Grey Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 hour ago, Prettytom said: Absolutely not. Its a very fair question. I wasn’t expecting Hackey to be able to answer it though. Seems I was right. Remember when Tony Blair lied about WMDs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now