TJC1 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Here you go ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:04 ---------- Yep.... Psssst, trying to prove a point. Right. So I said in all situations....not ALL men are sex pests. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:30 ---------- You strongly implied it when you said "men are sex pests". You forgot the word "some". i thought it was obvious...but i did qualify later twice. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:31 ---------- Muslims are terrorists. At least some of them are, in the same way as some men are rapists. Or are you trying to say the minute someone does something not according to the Koran, they can never be considered a Muslim again? Absolute nonsense. Ps. Doesn't the Koran say something about killing infidels? Maybe a separate debate not relevant to the comparison, but the double standards you apply to generalisation are breath taking. Im not debating muslims again...ridiculous. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:34 ---------- Judging by data and the fact theres millions of sex pests out there women are right to be afraid. Female carriages worth this consultation. point proved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiseOwl182 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Let's try a different parallel since the religious one seems too difficult for you to comprehend. Stats show black people are proportionately more likely to commit crimes. Should that be a basis for non-black carriages on trains? If not, why not? Because it is discrimination against a group on the basis of the actions of a minority, just like banishing men from certain carriages because a tiny minority are rapists. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:39 ---------- Right. So I said in all situations....not ALL men are sex pests. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:30 ---------- i thought it was obvious...but i did qualify later twice. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:31 ---------- Im not debating muslims again...ridiculous. ---------- Post added 28-08-2015 at 17:34 ---------- Judging by data and the fact theres millions of sex pests out there women are right to be afraid. Female carriages worth this consultation. point proved. "Millions of sex pests" in the UK? Well, there are around 30 million males in the UK, of which about 20 million sexually mature. "Millions" implies at least 2 million sex pests, so you're saying at least 10% of men are rabid sex pests just waiting for that moment on a train?! Did something happen to you in prison or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Let's try a different parallel since the religious one seems too difficult for you to comprehend. Stats show black people are proportionately more likely to commit crimes. Should that be a basis for non-black carriages on trains? If not, why not? Because it is discrimination against a group on the basis of the actions of a minority, just like banishing men from certain carriages because a tiny minority are rapists. Men are comitting millions of sex crimes, women are scared...solutions proposed...end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Guys, c'mon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Guys, c'mon Wiseowl talking bout flippin blacks now...!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiseOwl182 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Wiseowl talking bout flippin blacks now...!!! I'm drawing parallels to show the conflict in your logic. I expect most people reading this thread can understand that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 I'm drawing parallels to show the conflict in your logic. I expect most people reading this thread can understand that. By comparing apples and oranges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiseOwl182 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 By comparing apples and oranges. By comparing other scenarios where a minority's actions should not cause discrimination against the wider group to which they belong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJC1 Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 By comparing other scenarios where a minority's actions should not cause discrimination against the wider group to which they belong. Its not discrimination, its common sense if men cant behave on trains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MintPlumbing Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 Its not discrimination, its common sense if men cant behave on trains Most men and women can behave on trains, some men and women can't, catching and arresting the ones that can't is the common sense thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now