JFKvsNixon Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Then surely non proliferation is the cure...not spending £50billion on upgrades. How would you guard against nuclear blackmail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 (edited) Then surely non proliferation is the cure... You go first. The clue is in the phrase "Trident replacement". because the UK is already a signatory to the UN non-proliferation treaty. Edited September 1, 2015 by Eric Arthur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbeliever Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Convention forces of comparable strength are way, way more expensive so you can't save a penny by scrapping trident. Quite the reverse in fact. You're talking about £5billion/year which is mostly spent on goods and services provided by the UK people. Total public spending in the UK is over £700billion. Anybody who thinks we don't need a national defence was obviously hiding somewhere quiet smoking something funny when everybody else was in history lessons. How is this magical idea of non-proliferation to be achieved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vague_Boy Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Erm, by intelligence, conventional weapons, soldiers, you know the stuff that we've been using for the past 50 years. From 1965 (50 years ago) to the end of the 1980s we had the Cold War. I doubt if the British Army or conventional weapons cut much ice with the Warsaw Pact. Now you might say that in retaining a nuclear deterrent, Britain is punching above its weight. Possibly. However, our current Vanguard-class subs (Vanguard, Victorious, Vigilant and Vengeance) were built in Barrow-in-Furness by Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering, so a lot of the money went into creating jobs in this country. Likewise the £500 million will create "thousands of jobs". Isn't that what you lefties want? The government to be spending money and creating well-paid jobs, not just zero hours contract/minimum wage stuff. That's what you say you want anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Or moats or duck houses. Or mortgage fraud... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hots on Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 How would you guard against nuclear blackmail? Exactly. Nuclear weapons are horrible things but you can't uninvent them. That genie is out of the bottle and can't be put back in. God help us all if the SNP, CND and green idiots (and their American equivalents) ever got their way and unilaterally did away with our Nukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Time for an appropriate Yes (Prime) Minister reference: It amazes me how things never change and its just as accurate today as it was then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbeliever Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Exactly. Nuclear weapons are horrible things but you can't uninvent them. That genie is out of the bottle and can't be put back in. God help us all if the SNP, CND and green idiots (and their American equivalents) ever got their way and unilaterally did away with our Nukes. I suppose we could switch to VX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plantas_Vzla Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 what I wonder more is how much money could a country spend on feeding animals. I hope some day those statistics come to surface. I bet they are quite ridiculous compared to defense expenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemist Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 And if an enemy's missiles were speeding over here to wipe out massive areas the last words uttered by some maybe " I wish we had kept Trident as a deterrent to stop this happening ". Well they can always have a look at how things are going in Norway, Sweden Italy, Greece Turkey...... After all they are under the danger of being wiped out every day because they dont have a "nuclear deterrant" do they? I bet the Chinse and North Koreans are itching to attack them. No?? So why would they be itching to attack the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now