Jump to content

Making the poor better off


Should the goal be to reduce relative or absolute poverty?  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the goal be to reduce relative or absolute poverty?

    • The goal should be to reduce absolute poverty
      21
    • The goal should be to reduce relative poverty
      7
    • I reject your premise as there can be no conflict between the above 2 options
      3
    • I'm not interested in helping the poor
      6


Recommended Posts

Slightly off topic, but I thought it was against eu rules to have state owned companies?

 

Against EU rules to subsidise companies, so if they make a profit, all is ok. I thought that was why some of our shares in the banks got sold off, the state is allowed to help companies, but not subsidy year after year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly off topic, but I thought it was against eu rules to have state owned companies, hence the sale of royal mail, I'm well aware of the fact that the French and germans ignore this fact with their own state owned services, but how would he get them through into real life.

Also Labour has pro eu for many years now, so how would jc get these through his own party ?

 

No, Look at most of Europe, they have more state run businesses than the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.