Timeh Posted October 3, 2015 Author Share Posted October 3, 2015 Inconvenient and the Russians will be laughing their heads off. I cant get excited with little Timeh until he starts complaining and making threads condemning ISIS and Assad over their daily killing of civilians. Its Timeh, not little and theres plenty of people on here who do that already. ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 15:40 ---------- Accidents happen, this is why so many countries will not take military action these days. You can kill 1,000 militants preparing to massacre innocent people, but if you accidentally kill a civilian or god forbid an innocent child, you are a monster to people like you. At least the USA, like the UK will investigate and admit fault where appropriate, unlike the likes of Russia who will just deny everything in the face of evidence to the contrary. If America is at fault, it not because they targeted this hospital. They do everything they can to mitigate civilian casualties. Can you say the same for these militants or the Assad regime? Bloody hell, please dont tell me you actually believe that do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 (edited) Well lets see how the Russians do now they're in the act. The only way to sort this part of the world out is for a coalition of US, European, Russian and Chinese troops to permanently occupy Syria and Iraq, kill off ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah and set up zones of occupation like that in post war Germany. Oil production would be taken over and administered by the four power admin commission, a curfew imposed in all the principal cities which will be strictly enforced. All women will be given the right to vote along with complete gender equality. Acts of terror will be promptly dealt with by on the spot executions and all clerics will register with the occupying authorities and under constant scrutiny for any teachings of terrorism to their congregations. Later on perhaps a ruling body would be permitted picked from local moderates but the occupation would be set to last for several decades at least Russia and China would have a very valid interest in participating in such an occupation since both countries are surrounded by small Islamic states which could fall under ISIS at any time Edited October 3, 2015 by Harleyman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeh Posted October 3, 2015 Author Share Posted October 3, 2015 Well lets see how the Russians do now they're in the act. Well if they blow up no hospitals and kill no doctors i reckon they will do ok. ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 20:12 ---------- Well lets see how the Russians do now they're in the act. The only way to sort this part of the world out is for a coalition of US, European, Russian and Chinese troops is to permanently occupy Syria and Iraq, kill off ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah and set up zones of occupation like that in post war Germany. Oil production will be taken over and administered by the four power admin commission, a curfew imposed in all the principal cities which will be strictly enforced. All women will be given the right to vote along with complete gender equality. Acts of terror will be promptly dealt with by on the spot executions and all clerics will register with the occupying authorities and under constant scrutiny for any teachings of terrorism to their congregations. Later on perhaps a ruling body would be permitted picked from local moderates but the occupation would be set to last for several decades at least Russia and China would have a very valid interest in participating in such an occupation since both countries are surrounded by small Islamic states which could fall under ISIS at any time Or we could just leave them alone, stop funding and supplying ISIS and other groups and let them get on with their lives. Western interference is the root cause of all this. Make no mistake, America and its allies have blood on their hands. With Russia in on the act we could soon have blood on our noses. Dangerous times ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 Well if they blow up no hospitals and kill no doctors i reckon they will do ok. ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 20:12 ---------- Or we could just leave them alone, stop funding and supplying ISIS and other groups and let them get on with their lives. Western interference is the root cause of all this. Make no mistake, America and its allies have blood on their hands. With Russia in on the act we could soon have blood on our noses. Dangerous times ahead. Leave ISIS alone? How long before Saudi, Iran, Israel, Egypt and other Arab countries fall under the threat of ISIS? A war of biblical proportions would follow. a war of death and destruction you'd never believe. Make no mistake ISIS is feared and loathed by every Arab country and also Iran. The Israelis would probably be ready to use their nuke capabilities. We cannot leave ISIS alone, brute measures have to be taken even if it involves a complete invasion and occupation of Syria and Iraq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 The only way to sort this part of the world out is for a coalition of US, European, Russian and Chinese troops to permanently occupy Syria and Iraq, kill off ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hezbollah and set up zones of occupation like that in post war Germany. Oil production would be taken over and administered by the four power admin commission, a curfew imposed in all the principal cities which will be strictly enforced. and you wonder why the rest of the world think Americans are stupid. . . The Yanks couldn't even keep a lid on Iraq; how the hell would they contain the entire middle east ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 Well if they blow up no hospitals and kill no doctors i reckon they will do ok. ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 20:12 ---------- Or we could just leave them alone, stop funding and supplying ISIS and other groups and let them get on with their lives. Western interference is the root cause of all this. Make no mistake, America and its allies have blood on their hands. With Russia in on the act we could soon have blood on our noses. Dangerous times ahead. Should we have liberated Kuwait? Should we have liberated the Moslems in Kosovo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeh Posted October 3, 2015 Author Share Posted October 3, 2015 Leave ISIS alone? snipped America supply ISIS for crying out loud. Tell your gov to stop funding terrorists and then using said terrorists as an excuse for a land and oil grab. Its disgusting! ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 20:46 ---------- Should we have liberated Kuwait? Should we have liberated the Moslems in Kosovo? We didnt liberate Kuwait. Do your research. We invaded a modern educated country with a rich history and a diverse people because their leader (the same leader America supplied poison gas to to kill Iranians and Kurds) decided to sell HIS countries oil in Euros, Not Dollars. Dont even try to say it was for any other reason because you would be wrong, or lying im not sure which,. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 America supply ISIS for crying out loud. Tell your gov to stop funding terrorists and then using said terrorists as an excuse for a land and oil grab. Its disgusting! ---------- Post added 03-10-2015 at 20:46 ---------- We didnt liberate Kuwait. Do your research. We invaded a modern educated country with a rich history and a diverse people because their leader (the same leader America supplied poison gas to to kill Iranians and Kurds) decided to sell HIS countries oil in Euros, Not Dollars. Dont even try to say it was for any other reason because you would be wrong, or lying im not sure which,. So Saddam didn't invade Kuwait and the yanks didn't drive his forces out? Did I just imagine that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timeh Posted October 3, 2015 Author Share Posted October 3, 2015 (edited) So Saddam didn't invade Kuwait and the yanks didn't drive his forces out? Did I just imagine that? :hihi::hihi: Bless you mate. Your adorably naive. Yeah he did, with supplied arms from us and America, that was ok, we let him do it. What America didnt like is when he switched to selling oil in Euros (petro dollar, look it up) Same with Gaddafi. He was about to switch selling oil from dollars to gold dinar and looked what happened. Edited October 3, 2015 by Timeh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted October 3, 2015 Share Posted October 3, 2015 :hihi::hihi: Bless you mate. Your adorably naive. Yeah he did, with supplied arms from us and America, that was ok, we let him do it. What America didnt like is when he switched to selling oil in Euros (petro dollar, look it up) Same with Gaddafi. He was about to switch selling oil from dollars to gold dinar and looked what happened. "On 3 August 1990, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 660 condemning the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and demanding that Iraq unconditionally withdraw all forces deployed in Kuwait" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now