JFKvsNixon Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 That's not relevant, you asked what else they could do, I just gave them an alternative, one that I have used in the past, I wasn't happy with a change in my terms of employment so I quit and found a job I was happy with. The employer will have no doubt found someone to replace me that was happy with the terms of employment. Don't worry many will quit. This comes at a time when many departments are already struggling to find staff to fill positions. Would you really consider this to be a way that the NHS should be managed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daven Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Hunt is on a campaign to demoralise the medical profession - once that is done he will start on the nurses. Be afraid - be VERY afraid. It will all end badly for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 (edited) Neither, I believe the facts, I read the new contract and the old contract and Hunt is closer to the truth than the doctors. Maybe you could offer your services to the junior doctors, because you've seen something that they can't. Edited April 26, 2016 by JFKvsNixon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubaidani13 Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 If the government wants the NHS to work fully seven days a week, it needs to hire the staff to work seven days a week. It's pretty simple. It's wrong to cut the workforces pay and conditions to meet that aim. i agree to some extent but this is not the way to do it, we wouldnt need so many staff if the population hadnt got so overcrowded and was treating every tom dick and harry from all over the world for free?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daven Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Maybe you could offer your devices to the junior doctors, because you've seen something that they can't. Something that isn't there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 (edited) Don't worry many will quit. This comes at a time when many departments are already struggling to find staff to fill positions. Would you really consider this to be a way that the NHS should be managed? Personalty I would put more money into the NHS, I would pay them more, I would train more doctors, nursers, but it would need money to fund it. That money is available but for now it is being spent on other less important things, the EU, overseas aid, supporting low skilled, low waged and unemployed immigrates, benefits, ect. ---------- Post added 26-04-2016 at 09:27 ---------- Maybe you could offer your devices to the junior doctors, because you've seen something that they can't. So they haven't even seen the contract they are rejecting? ---------- Post added 26-04-2016 at 09:28 ---------- i agree to some extent but this is not the way to do it, we wouldnt need so many staff if the population hadnt got so overcrowded and was treating every tom dick and harry from all over the world for free?? Exactly. Edited April 26, 2016 by sutty27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 i agree to some extent but this is not the way to do it, we wouldnt need so many staff if the population hadnt got so overcrowded and was treating every tom dick and harry from all over the world for free?? So how would you go about it then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Luthor Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Personalty I would put more money into the NHS, I would pay them more, I would train more doctors, nursers, but it would need money to fund it. That money is available but for now it is being spent on other less important things, the EU, overseas aid, supporting low skilled, low waged and unemployed immigrates, benefits, ect: Don't forget the 'untapped' money in the Panama accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Don't forget the 'untapped' money in the Panama accounts. The UK government doesn't have access to that money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Luthor Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 i agree to some extent but this is not the way to do it, we wouldnt need so many staff if the population hadnt got so overcrowded and was treating every tom dick and harry from all over the world for free?? We are seeing record immigration levels under this government who have failed to meet their own targets, like they have failed to meet their deficit ones too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now