mafya Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 I think most people would be highly unsurprised if the US or the EU were indeed supplying arms directly to ISIS, but real, valid evidence of them doing so would be incredible. Indirectly yes= http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/06/04/Fog-War-US-Has-Armed-ISIS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Indirectly yes= http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/06/04/Fog-War-US-Has-Armed-ISIS Thats known about though and just an experiemnt that didnt turn out the way they intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy76 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Indirectly yes= http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/06/04/Fog-War-US-Has-Armed-ISIS Did IS capture loads of US supplied weapons when the Iraqi army fled? Yes Have IS captured US supplied kit from the FSA and other US backed group? Yes Have some people from US supported groups defected to IS with weapons? Yes Does any of the above equal US is arming daesh? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rinzwind Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Ben Swann provides a nice summary, The American defence intelligence agency said in 2012 that... "There is the possibillity of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria and this is precisely what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime” http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf The DIA report makes the following summary points concerning ISIS: Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria The West identifies with the opposition The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-12/us-paradrops-50-tons-ammo-syrian-rebels http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/07/02/judge-nap-hillary-clinton-approved-arms-terrorists-syria-libya https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPSOhICt7qg http://www.globalresearch.ca/israeli-bombers-over-syria-al-qaedas-air-force/5357471 Some more background.... http://www.activistpost.com/2014/09/the-roots-of-isis.html http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/uk-sends-5-million-to-listed-terrorists.html http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/officials-u-s-trained-isis-at-secret-base-in-jordan/ http://www.landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/implausible-deniability-wests-isis.html http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/08/best-way-stop-isis-syria-stop-arming-isis-syria.html http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/12/politics/syria-arming-rebels/ http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304626304579509401865454762 http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/in-syria-there-are-no-moderates.html http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syria-arming-the-rebels/syrian-rebels-describe-u-s-backed-training-in-qatar/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/i-am-not-fighting-againstalqaida-itsnot-our-problem-says-wests-last-hope-in-syria-9233424.html http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175884/ http://www.activistpost.com/2014/08/nato-using-foley-and-isis-as-pretext.html http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-16/mystery-sponsor-weapons-and-money-syrian-rebels-revealed http://rt.com/op-edge/168064-isis-terrorism-usa-cia-war/ http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/someones-already-fighting-isis-syrian-arab-army http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/09/12/how-the-west-created-the-islamic-state/ http://www.activistpost.com/2014/09/nato-airstrikes-target-grain-silos-in.html http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-16/mystery-sponsor-weapons-and-money-syrian-rebels-revealed http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/03/there-are-no-moderate-syrian-rebels/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TBH9f1Pk60 http://sheffieldchitchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=10904 Some more background... https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1006045/possible-implications-of-bad-intelligence.pdf https://www.rt.com/news/322305-isis-financed-40-countries/ Some satire... http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/moderate-syrian-rebel-application-form Hope this helps. x Edited November 26, 2015 by rinzwind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Hope this helps. x As soon as I saw Infowars and Prisonplanet then any credibility sank to below zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rinzwind Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) As soon as I saw Infowars and Prisonplanet then any credibility sank to below zero Fair enough. I was just linking to the photo's. I have removed those links since their authenticity is in question. The same photo's can be found elsewhere. Radio host Angel Clark claims to have first posted the pictures on social networking websites and says they are genuine. Mainstream media claims a bunch of Syrian hackers dressed up in US military uniforms complete with medals and hacked in to marines.com and left the pictures there. I don't have any proof either way. Edited November 26, 2015 by rinzwind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy76 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 I was just linking to the photo's. I have removed those links since their authenticity is in question. Do any of those links contain any evidence that the US has armed daesh? The ones I looked at either had nothing to do with the issue or involved the potential for US arms to rebels falling into IS hands which is not in dispute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie Bynnol Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Matt Drudge is a respected political commentator and investagative journalist. ... Certainly not in the British sense. "Drudge is a menace to honest, responsible journalism... And to the extent that he's read and people believe what they read, he's dangerous." Michael Isikoff of Newsweek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rinzwind Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Do any of those links contain any evidence that the US has armed daesh? The ones I looked at either had nothing to do with the issue or involved the potential for US arms to rebels falling into IS hands which is not in dispute. You seem to be suggesting the USA has armed ISIS by accident. What would you like as evidence? A declassified receipt given to the USA by ISIS saying "Thank you for all the guns"? No there is nothing like that. You have to actually put it all together by yourself. Maybe you could ask Serena Shim. I'm just suggesting this is the type of evidence Matt Drudge could be basing his opinions on. Which links did you feel had nothing to do with the issue? ---------- Post added 26-11-2015 at 20:02 ---------- Certainly not in the British sense. "Drudge is a menace to honest, responsible journalism... And to the extent that he's read and people believe what they read, he's dangerous." Michael Isikoff of Newsweek Sour grapes perhaps? Isikoff had been prepared to break the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but several hours before going to print, the article was killed by top Newsweek executives. As a result, the story broke first on Matt Drudge's Drudge Report the following morning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Isikoff Edited November 27, 2015 by rinzwind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy76 Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 What would you like as evidence? A declassified receipt given to the USA by ISIS saying "Thank you for all the guns"? No there is nothing like that. You have to actually put it all together by yourself. Maybe you could ask Serena Shim. I'm just suggesting this is the kind of evidence Matt Drudge could be basing his opinions on. Which ones had nothing to do with the issue? ---------- Post added 26-11-2015 at 20:02 ---------- Sour grapes perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Isikoff I'd like evidence, like actual proof. Not conspiracy theorist wibble. Do you have any or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now