cassity Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Sorry!.............but some people need executing!....the best option for them,and the best option for us! Gay sex, apostasy, and adultery? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Gay sex, apostasy, and adultery?............non of those!............try again till we get to something nasty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betterman Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Gay sex, apostasy, and adultery? Its their country and their religion and its not our place to interfere unless they are a threat to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cassity Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 ............non of those!............try again till we get to something nasty! SA nastily executes for those reasons. Maybe you could make a suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoned Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 How bad would it have to be for the UK to begin sanctions against Saudi Arabia. Wont happen. The Saudis sell us too much oil and we sell them too many armaments and both our governments are too corrupt to end that relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Sorry!.............but some people need executing!....the best option for them,and the best option for us! Which people do you have in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cassity Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 (edited) Its their country and their religion and its not our place to interfere unless they are a threat to us. Ironic isn't it how SA imposes harsh draconian religious laws on it's own people (remind you of Daesh?)..especially women, while we in the West stand by with "it's their own country innit". Seems odd that the criteria of pointing out the wrong doing of other states is a requirement of zipping it unless you personally feel threatened. Edited December 4, 2015 by cassity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lottiecass Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Why don't we include China and all the rest that execute people? No we can't for the same reason we don't interfere with SA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Ironic isn't it how SA imposes harsh draconian religious laws on it's own people (remind you of Daesh?)..especially women, while we in the West stand by with "it's their own country innit". Seems odd that the criteria of pointing out the wrong doing of other states is a requirement of zipping it unless you personally feel threatened. Daesh arent a country, they are classed as a terrorist organisation. SA arent carrying out terrorism against us, which is a wholly valid reason for why you might not approve of Daesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 SA nastily executes for those reasons. Maybe you could make a suggestion...........Peter Sutcliffe! The Paris bombers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now