Jump to content

Schoolboy not questioned for living in a terrorist house


Recommended Posts

The police have complained to the BBC that the infant and his family hadn't been questioned as terrorism suspects after the child wrote in his schoolbook that he lived in a terrorist house.

 

Apparently there was something else going on in the background but it wasn't terror related.

 

It looks like very shoddy journalism to make these sort of damaging claims that wind everyone up.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/21/lancashire-police-criticise-bbc-over-terrorist-house-story

 

Police have criticised the BBC for publishing a story that claimed a spelling error led to a 10-year-old Muslim boy being investigated over terror allegations, and warned the press of the impact it could have on community relations.

 

On Wednesday, the BBC reported that a boy who attends a Lancashire primary school was interviewed by police after he had written that he lived in a “terrorist house”. His family claimed this was a spelling mistake and he meant to say he lived in a “terraced house”.

 

Lancashire Constabulary’s police and crime commissioner, Clive Grunshaw, has written to BBC Lancashire about its reporting, which he said had damaged relations. The police said the family were not interrogated as potential terrorists.

 

The police visit took place because of other worrying issues in the boy’s school work, not just the “terrorist house” line, Grunshaw said. The concerns were “reported through the appropriate channels”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'The police visit took place because of other worrying issues in the boy’s school work, not just the “terrorist house” line, Grunshaw said. The concerns were “reported through the appropriate channels”.'

 

What aspect of a child's school work would warrant a visit from the Police? It seems a spelling mistake (terrace becomes terrorist) doesn't, so surely something actually more serious than the original reason given?

 

The only things I can think of are signs of abuse to the child, or the lad has spilled the beans on something sinister going on at home, such as domestic violence or other criminal activity.

 

Makes you wonder if the spelling mistake story was given to the press by the family or another close source as to cover up the real reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'The police visit took place because of other worrying issues in the boy’s school work, not just the “terrorist house” line, Grunshaw said. The concerns were “reported through the appropriate channels”.'

 

What aspect of a child's school work would warrant a visit from the Police? It seems a spelling mistake (terrace becomes terrorist) doesn't, so surely something actually more serious than the original reason given?

 

The only things I can think of are signs of abuse to the child, or the lad has spilled the beans on something sinister going on at home, such as domestic violence or other criminal activity.

 

Makes you wonder if the spelling mistake story was given to the press by the family or another close source as to cover up the real reason.

 

He probably wrote an essay about being married off to his cousin next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What aspect of a child's school work would warrant a visit from the Police? It seems a spelling mistake (terrace becomes terrorist) doesn't, so surely something actually more serious than the original reason given?

 

The only things I can think of are signs of abuse to the child, or the lad has spilled the beans on something sinister going on at home, such as domestic violence or other criminal activity.

 

I read somewhere, possibly The Independent but I can't find it now, that the boy had been asked to write a story. As well as using the phrase "terrorist house", he'd put that he was fed up of his uncle hitting him - both things made up. Teachers have a legal duty to report things that might generate concerns about terrorism or child abuse and the lad's story would have triggered both. Teachers don't have the option of having a quiet chat with a child to check everything is OK anymore, so the police became involved. They investigated and found nothing to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere, possibly The Independent but I can't find it now, that the boy had been asked to write a story. As well as using the phrase "terrorist house", he'd put that he was fed up of his uncle hitting him - both things made up. Teachers have a legal duty to report things that might generate concerns about terrorism or child abuse and the lad's story would have triggered both. Teachers don't have the option of having a quiet chat with a child to check everything is OK anymore, so the police became involved. They investigated and found nothing to worry about.

 

I also read this in The Independent but can't see it now.

 

There are details here

 

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/14216694.Father_of__terrorist_house__error_youngster_demands_apology_from_Accrington_school/?ref=trn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.