TV licence thread

[HeHasRisen]

5 minutes ago, ukdobby said:

Ditto.

so Bbc don’t have 2 or 3 pundits? As well as a reporter every news program.

 

All channels do. It's an accepted standard in sports and news broadcasting in the year 2023.  It looks cheap otherwise. 

 

Imagine the moaning the Daily Mail would be doing if the BBC covered the Olympics from a studio in Salford with one pundit only, it would be through the roof. 

 

 

Edited August 20, 2023 by HeHasRisen

[Guest]

7 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

BBC News simulcasts with BBC One for that hour, and it's a breakfast magazine programme for the masses. Dont see the harm in them having two hosts. They don't for the rest of the time. 

 

Now let's do one the other way then... Portrait Artist Of The Year, on Sky Arts (you never said which Sky channels you were talking about btw) has two hosts. Do they need two hosts?  

 

All channels have programme with two hosts when in your opinion one would probably suffice, it's hardly a BBC thing.  It's what people expect in modern day television 

 

Sky News isn't 233 in my house btw, because I am not a Freeview peasant. 

1  -  Once again  You don't see the harm in them having 2 hosts  Why do you think that it's only what you see that matters.

2  -  Sky pay for their presenters not us.

3  -  We don't pay for all channels   -   we only pay for BBC so thee others can do as they please.

Not only you pays a licence fee so not only you gets a say in what the BBC should do.

 

[HeHasRisen]

Just now, Organgrinder said:

Why do you think that it's only what you see that matters.

Please don't post your personal opinion on this forum ever again then  😂😂😂😂

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

All channels do. It's an accepted standard in sports and news broadcasting in the year 2023.  It looks cheap otherwise. 

 

Imagine the moaning the Daily Mail would be doing if the BBC covered the Olympics from a studio in Salford with one pundit only, it would be through the roof. 

 

 

All other channels pay for themselves so they can look as expensive as they like.

Who cares what the Daily Mail says ?  You are not capable of conversing without the usual childish exaggeration

 

[HeHasRisen]

Just now, Organgrinder said:

All other channels pay for themselves so they can look as expensive as they like.

Who cares what the Daily Mail says ?  You are not capable of conversing without the usual childish exaggeration

 

Please stop posting your personal opinion on the forum, mate. Your rules. Cheers. 

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Please don't post your personal opinion on this forum ever again then  😂😂😂😂

You said that,  not me         back to the schoolboy stuff again.

[HeHasRisen]

1 minute ago, Organgrinder said:

You said that,  not me         back to the schoolboy stuff again.

Not at all. You are the one who has an issue with me posting an opinion on here. Kindly stop posting your own opinions too. Ta. 

[Guest]

43 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Not at all. You are the one who has an issue with me posting an opinion on here. Kindly stop posting your own opinions too. Ta. 

Show me where I said that

have you taken to lying too now ?

 

Edited August 20, 2023 by Organgrinder

[HeHasRisen]

51 minutes ago, Organgrinder said:

Why do you think that it's only what you see that matters.

Here, mate. Happy to help. 

 

If you don't agree with me that's fine. Don't think for one second I won't be posting it though. 

Edited August 20, 2023 by HeHasRisen

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

Here, mate. Happy to help. 

 

If you don't agree with me that's fine. Don't think for one second I won't be posting it though. 

You need to understand the meaning of ordinary English words..

I've said that your opinions are NOT THE ONLY OPINIONS THAT MATTER.

That means something different to what you obviously think it does.