flamingjimmy Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 (edited) I didn't put forward my argument, like I said- However, if you'd continued to read it, the full quote is which, being a paper by a long established and well respected professor, should be right up your street. Usually yeah that's cool and I'd discuss it. However you've already stated flat out that you're not going to argue with me because I'm 'logically challenged' and strongly implied that all your opponents on this thread are 'of low intellect'. So I'll leave you to it this time. What's the point in taking 'my turn' if all I'm going to get back is insults like that? Also of the very next day after that you started pulling others up on this thread for ad hominems, you hypocrite. Edited February 17, 2016 by flamingjimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 (edited) Hear, hear- spot on. I find it really galling how these pseudo-rationalists with their blah blah That's because the sensible people can't be arsed to explain the simplest things yet again to people who believe in fairies and magic. It grinds you down and frays the temper to have to need to convince people about A level science. Personally I think you should be able to opt yourself out of the NHS if you feel like it. You either get it all or nothing but you can take your ill informed rubbish and drop dead if that's what you really believe in. Edited February 17, 2016 by Eric Arthur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Personally I think you should be able to opt yourself out of the NHS if you feel like it. You either get it all or nothing but you can take your ill informed rubbish and drop dead if that's what you really believe in. Big problem with that is that children get their decisions made for them and can't be expected to be informed or rational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Big problem with that is that children get their decisions made for them and can't be expected to be informed or rational. Very true. Some kind of enforced adoption of idiot's children seems in order then as a child protection measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 This is what anti vaxxination is. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-35596857 Look at it Read it. If you dont want to vaccinate your children, this is what you risk. These diseases kill. Meningitis - 10% fatality rate Polio - 2% fatality rate Measles 5% serious complications. 0.1% die. If you do not get them vaccinated you will catch these diseases. If they catch them some of them will die. Lots of them. Every year. Every single year. All the time. This is what you want? Shame on you all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAC33 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 That article is good PR no doubt. But,a closer read will reveal the scare tactics. "Although the introduction of the Men B vaccine on the childhood immunisation scheme for young babies was a momentous achievement, saving thousands of lives, there are still so many, like Faye, left unprotected. That is a claim of lives saved with NO time period mentioned. Secondly,with such high vaccination rates anyway,around 90 percent,the vast majority contracting the disease will be vaccinated. This suggests that the vaccine is not working. Just like the flu vax does not work either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Secondly,with such high vaccination rates anyway,around 90 percent,the vast majority contracting the disease will be vaccinated. That is a verifiable suggestion so please provide the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAC33 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/nhs-immunisation-statistics-england-2014-to-2015 Please provide the evidence that the kids contracting all these diseases are Not vaccinated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/nhs-immunisation-statistics-england-2014-to-2015 Please provide the evidence that the kids contracting all these diseases are Not vaccinated You made the claim so it is up to you to back it up. The pro vaccination position is widely accepted with plenty of peer reviewed evidence so if you disagree you need to provide real peer reviewed statistical evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtkate Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 That article is good PR no doubt. But,a closer read will reveal the scare tactics. "Although the introduction of the Men B vaccine on the childhood immunisation scheme for young babies was a momentous achievement, saving thousands of lives, there are still so many, like Faye, left unprotected. That is a claim of lives saved with NO time period mentioned. Secondly,with such high vaccination rates anyway,around 90 percent,the vast majority contracting the disease will be vaccinated. This suggests that the vaccine is not working. Just like the flu vax does not work either. All I can say is thank god you don't live in the UK as if you did and your unvaccinated kids were in my local school I'd remove my kids from that school to keep them away from yours. You are just an idiot. I'm sorry to get offensive but it needs to be said repeatedly until you go and understand maths. This isn't even about science with you, you cannot even do basic addition and subtraction. You are pathetic and I truly feel sorry for any children you may have that your decisions are adversely affecting their lives and when they get a disease for which there is a vaccine then I hope you will realise that it is your fault and your fault alone. I looked at the links you sent me out of interest and they are illogical, false and are based on a similar lack of understanding to your around numbers. There is clearly not point in arguing with you are rather than looking at evidence you have decided to believe anecdotes over years and years of double blind experiments. You do understand double blind right? That's where even the people doing the testing have no way to tell who has which treatment until after the experiment has been completed so there is NO WAY to manipulate that. If you can start to open your closed mind just a fraction and get your head around that then perhaps you can still save your own kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now