Gamston Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Why are you trying to explain the SOG act to me? Because you appear to have a lack of understanding of it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 The entire repair has not involved the owner of the phone, a recipe for confusion; Danot should let his daughter sort it out, or at least be present. How old is she? She's recently turned 12 so it's in my name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Because you appear to have a lack of understanding of it . On what basis... point it out. ---------- Post added 18-02-2016 at 17:47 ---------- The sale of good act doesn't ....or suffered accidental damage because this would be unfair to honest sellers . Water damage as a result of immersion would be fairly classed as accidental damage . If the shop has faked the water damage or it simply did not happen then is a trading standards issue . Whereabouts in the SOG at does it say this out of interest? Which section? Accidental damage and water immersion could be covered it all depends on the circumstances and the goods in question. The tests are what case allided to. Btw its now the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamston Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 On what basis... point it out.[COLOR="Silver"] ---------- Post added 18-02-2016 at 17:47 ---------- [/color] Whereabouts in the SOG at does it say this out of interest? Which section? Accidental damage and water immersion could be covered it all depends on the circumstances and the goods in question. The tests are what case allided to. Btw its now the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Your added post has just proved you have a lack of understanding of it . Accidental damage is not the fault of the retailer . Don't give the day job up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Your added post has just proved you have a lack of understanding of it . Accidental damage is not the fault of the retailer . Don't give the day job up You havent proved anything and I never said it was. Come on Gamston quote some SOG at me. Which section? Impress us all with your knowledge. If I asked kate, cyclone, JFK, Loob they would all point it out. ---------- Post added 18-02-2016 at 17:58 ---------- She's recently turned 12 so it's in my name. Just looking....what was the date of purchase? Did you keep a copu of the thing you signed? Edited February 18, 2016 by 999tigger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamston Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 You havent proved anything and I never said it was. Come on Gamston quote some SOG at me. Which section? Impress us all with your knowledge. If I asked kate, cyclone, JFK, Loob they would all point it out. I don't need to impress anyone You are most welcome to prove me wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I don't need to impress anyone You are most welcome to prove me wrong Well you are unable to explain how the sog works. There are instances where accidental damage and water samage would be covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamston Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Well you are unable to explain how the sog works. There are instances where accidental damage and water samage would be covered. Make up your mind first you ask me why I am explaining the Sales Of Goods Act to you , then you ask me to explain it again Then you point out it is now the Consumer Rights Act 2015, but you continue to refer to it as SOG . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Your added post has just proved you have a lack of understanding of it . Accidental damage is not the fault of the retailer . Don't give the day job up How do you think most damage occurs? its not deliberate. If i drop something which claims to be unbreakable and it breaks, then thats not fit for purpose or of satisfactory quality. If I biy something as waterproof like a sony tablet or a wetsuit and it suffers from water damage, then its not fit for the purpose or of satisfactory quality. So it's the indibdual circumstancs when applied to the tests which are important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 You havent proved anything and I never said it was. Come on Gamston quote some SOG at me. Which section? Impress us all with your knowledge. If I asked kate, cyclone, JFK, Loob they would all point it out. ---------- Post added 18-02-2016 at 17:58 ---------- Just looking....what was the date of purchase? Did you keep a copu of the thing you signed? I have all relevant paperwork. Took out contract on 31/10/15. Took out insurance too, which was the next step until realising the phone is fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now