Jump to content

Apple rejects order to unlock gunman's phone


Absolute right to keep mobile phone encrypted? Apple v Govt  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Absolute right to keep mobile phone encrypted? Apple v Govt

    • Apple are right and the mans phone should remain encrypted
      43
    • Govt are right and in this case Apple should give them access.
      34


Recommended Posts

I don't see that we can say the spooks are entitled to access terrorists data whether in hard or electronic form whereever it is, err except on certain iphones where it's not allowed to be touched. Apple need to get cracking on how to open the phne up and stop being so bloody obstinate. And given on their new models all the FBI have to do is chop off johny jihads thumb before they stick him in the ground and freeze it and they have all the access they want it's a legacy issue anyway so not sure why they are making such a fuss.

 

Why? It's nothing to do with Apple. The Govt have a right to access the data sure.

 

They don't have the right to compel a disinterested third party to assist them. Certainly they don't have the right to require Apple to circumvent legal protections that have been placed on the phone - even assuming it's possible.

 

It's like when the police want entry to a building. They don't demand that Yale come and make the lock undo at their expense. They pony up with a battering ram. Why should Apple be required to force entry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? It's nothing to do with Apple. The Govt have a right to access the data sure.

 

They don't have the right to compel a disinterested third party to assist them. Certainly they don't have the right to require Apple to circumvent legal protections that have been placed on the phone - even assuming it's possible.

 

It's like when the police want entry to a building. They don't demand that Yale come and make the lock undo at their expense. They pony up with a battering ram. Why should Apple be required to force entry?

 

Apple don't have to open the door. They can wait for the battering ram if they like. But that ram will open all their phones not just court sanctioned ones so they would be utter belters not to comply and cooperate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And hows that ram going to do that then?

 

That's down to the FBI. And the NSA. And the CIA. Not people I'd like to make enemies of tbh if I were an overpriced bunch of nerdy arrogant jackasses with shrinking market share.

 

Posted from my annoying overpriced iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not down to any of them. It's down to the US courts. Who are usually fairly sensible all things considered.

 

And while the courts are busy buggering about John Q Nerdy on the design team is informed that nice young girl he met yesterday who was so interested in the insubstantial contents of his pants is in fact 13 and he's of to Joliett as a nonce unless he works on the hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.