truman Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Making decisions based on not a lot tends to be sillier. Clickbait is the basis of their business model and they are pretty good at it. Can you come up with a link/report that refutes this one in the mail? Are you saying it's not true? again genuine questions.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Can you come up with a link/report that refutes this one in the mail? Are you saying it's not true? again genuine questions.. what am I refuting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 what am I refuting? I've just reread my post and I didn't say you were.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I've just reread my post and I didn't say you were.. Which point in the Mail are you wanting refuting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Can you just park a caravan on council land and live there? I can't but the council could use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Heath Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I don't see any deduction there at all. Just a whole bunch of prejudice and racism. Perhaps you you read it till you understand. I realise it is difficult for many to take in the truth but if there is one fact in my assertion that you care to challenge please do so. Silly one liners add nothing to the debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I can't but the council could use it. Its another stupid idea from you. The rules on HB are about financial assistance and not giving property of a particular type. Caravans are temporary and would be unsuitable, especially as they have 2 disabled kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 One point always missed out is rather than focus on how much the house is worth, take account of where it is. Any 6 bedroom house in Camden is going to cost a lot of money. The house is still the landlords. The rent goes to the private LL milking the system. They wouldnt have to house them in the private sector if much of the social housing stock hadnt been sold off. They should provide some more in the form of tents and caravans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomgeg Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Utter madness, it's nothing to do with racism or any other ism. The simple fact is whoever you are if you can't afford eight kids don't have them and expect taxpayers to pay for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Because if you do some research then you will see they were asulum seekers and have now been given leave to remain. Housing benefit is to do with being given asistance to rent and not the right to a particular house. So the obligation isnt to house but to give assistance. Go and look it up. What does any of that have to do with my post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now