sutty27 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 ERM.......a lower tax rate is equal to giving them money they are financially better off because of the rate, which means the government would have had to find the money from somewhere.....wrap it up how you want, but its simple maths.... and a lot of the disabled people would have been losing money that they needed, i personalty know someone who is a disability analyst with ATOS, and i have it from the horses mouth, The government can say what they want, but what the government say and what the truth is are two very different things No it isn't, its equal asking them for less, and when you ask for less they put less effort into avoiding it, they also invest more in their businesses and employ more people which generate more tax. Its a proven fact that lower tax rates generate more tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjodeano Posted March 22, 2016 Author Share Posted March 22, 2016 Nothing was being given to the better off, and nothing that the disabled needed was been taken from them. Try telling that to the families that have had a loved ones commit suicide after finding out they have lost their money......the reort is due out this week i think, the report that they tried to block No it isn't, its equal asking them for less, and when you ask for less they put less effort into avoiding it, they also invest more in their businesses and employ more people which generate more tax. Its a proven fact that lower tax rates generate more tax. Yes it is....and who says the people that are financially better off have a business :huh: that is a little presumptuous, they could be any Joe Bloggs that has a good job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Try telling that to the families that have had a loved ones commit suicide after finding out they have lost their money......the reort is due out this week i think, the report that they tried to block Yes it is....and who says the people that are financially better off have a business :huh: that is a little presumptuous, they could be any Joe Bloggs that has a good job His proposal was about Corporation Tax not Income Tax, I take it you know the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjodeano Posted March 22, 2016 Author Share Posted March 22, 2016 His proposal was about Corporation Tax not Income Tax, I take it you know the difference. my apologies, i understood it to be income tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 my apologies, i understood it to be income tax No problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 IDS has some time on his hands now. Is he any better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 No it isn't, its equal asking them for less, and when you ask for less they put less effort into avoiding it, they also invest more in their businesses and employ more people which generate more tax. Its a proven fact that lower tax rates generate more tax. so if this theory is correct why is it that they are keen to keep avoiding paying it here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjodeano Posted March 24, 2016 Author Share Posted March 24, 2016 so if this theory is correct why is it that they are keen to keep avoiding paying it here because they want it both ways, avoid paying tax here, and what little they do pay, have it at a lower rate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sutty27 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 so if this theory is correct why is it that they are keen to keep avoiding paying it here Because they prefer to pay tax in a country which asks for less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 "Who should replace Osborne?" Whomever Mr Cameron decides to appoint. It's not in the gift of Her Majesty, the electorate, Conservative Party, House of Commons, Conservative MPs, or even the Cabinet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now