alchemist Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 German Company? Typical! Couldn't they find a British one? And does it really need expensive full page pictures? All it needed was that Izal toilet paper. Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it ---------- Post added 08-04-2016 at 13:25 ---------- I saw a quote on Jeremy Vines twitter account this morning from a UK 'printer' saying that they were mystified as to the cost. They reckoned that the gov had been overcharged to the tune of something like 8 million. How accurate that was I'm not sure. But the quoted cost, seems one hell of a lot of money. ---------- Post added 08-04-2016 at 12:42 ---------- So the profits will end up in Germany? And of course, not taxed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spilldig Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 There's a Downing Street in the centre of Sheffield too?? I never knew that. Hope,s always been in Derbyshire though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 All it needed was that Izal toilet paper. Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it Now wash your hands of it ---------- Post added 08-04-2016 at 13:25 ---------- And of course, not taxed So you know for definite that Williams Lea pay no UK tax? Genuine question... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 I saw a quote on Jeremy Vines twitter account this morning from a UK 'printer' saying that they were mystified as to the cost. They reckoned that the gov had been overcharged to the tune of something like 8 million. How accurate that was I'm not sure. But the quoted cost, seems one hell of a lot of money. ---------- Post added 08-04-2016 at 12:42 ---------- So the profits will end up in Germany? I presume that the total cost also included the mailing costs which would be a fair amount of the total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quik Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 I presume that the total cost also included the mailing costs which would be a fair amount of the total. Good news for the hedge funds that own the Royal Mail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Good news for the hedge funds that own the Royal Mail. And the pension funds as well..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) So that's what the Government's effort at informing the voting public about the referendum reduces the debate to? Whinges about who/where is the parent company of the leaflet printers who profits from the operation and will pay corporate tax in 2017 or not on that profit? And people like that are allowed to vote in the referendum to decide the future of the UK? Double facepalm does not even come close. Edited April 11, 2016 by nikki-red masked swearing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 (edited) Good news for the hedge funds that own the Royal Mail. You really don't care about anything other than stirring up or attempting to stir up muck do you. none whatsoever apart from the fact that if it's got a blue rosette you just assume it's bad. FFS I've better things to do. It's time to actually use the ignore button. ---------- Post added 08-04-2016 at 16:39 ---------- So that's what the Government's effort at informing the voting public about the referendum reduces the debate to? Whinges about who/where is the parent company of the leaflet printers who profits from the operation and will pay corporate tax in 2017 or not on that profit? And people like that are allowed to vote in the referendum to decide the future of the UK? Double facepalm does not even come close. I've come to the same conclusion. Churchill once said the most powerful argument against democracy was five minutes conversing with the average voter didn't he? Edited April 11, 2016 by nikki-red masked swearing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASGOWOODS Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 Not really. You lot demanded a referendum and you got one. So now you want to make a decision that isn't informed? The Leave campaign can spend their money like this if they wish, but I suspect they won't have enough of a convincing argument to fill the back of a postage stamp. Nationalising a loss making industry. Now that would be an abuse of taxpayers money. So is wasting billions on failed public sector projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samssong Posted April 8, 2016 Author Share Posted April 8, 2016 So is wasting billions on failed public sector projects. As well as millions on leaf lets;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now