Fudbeer Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Answered virtually nothing with a straight answer and came across as a bully. Would not even agree his company was accountable for its pension scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Answered virtually nothing with a straight answer and came across as a bully. Would not even agree his company was accountable for its pension scheme. He may turn out not worthy of the title 'Sir', yet another one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 "I don't like the way you're asking the question" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomjames Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) Answered virtually nothing with a straight answer and came across as a bully. Would not even agree his company was accountable for its pension scheme. They can't lay a finger on him though. He's surrounded himself with advisors in mergers & acquisitions and some of them have even got shares in BHS! ---------- Post added 15-06-2016 at 14:02 ---------- Corrupt as <removed> Edited June 15, 2016 by nikki-red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Luthor Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 MP's grilling successful businessman. Because MPs are so whiter than white. You have a very different view of what 'success' is to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamston Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Answered virtually nothing with a straight answer and came across as a bully. Would not even agree his company was accountable for its pension scheme. I saw a bit of the questioning and don't think he behaved like a bully. He stood is own ground, but agree he didn't seem to give straight answers on the main issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomjames Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 It wasnt exactly fair hearing but Green has got to cough up and thats that. I do think its government who have allowed all this corruption to happen though, so its kind of hypocritical to then take the moral high ground. Some of the panel were highly odious individuals. And to think we, the public, pay for this disagreeable rabble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 You have a very different view of what 'success' is to me. You dont think a personal wealth of 4.9 billion and owner of a company that has 2500 stores across the country is not successful? ---------- Post added 15-06-2016 at 19:55 ---------- It wasnt exactly fair hearing but Green has got to cough up and thats that. I do think its government who have allowed all this corruption to happen though, so its kind of hypocritical to then take the moral high ground. Some of the panel were highly odious individuals. And to think we, the public, pay for this disagreeable rabble. I have to agree with you about the Panel including its Chairman. However, I must query your use of the word "corruption" What corruption exactly. Green was at this enquiry voluntary. He was not under arrest. He is not facing any criminal charges. He has not been found to be fraudulent nor dishonest. Badly advised - maybe Ill judged - yes. Made a huge mistake - yes Damaged reputation - most definately Needs to make amends - yes Not anywhere in the ball park of "corruption" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Futures Red Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 You dont think a personal wealth of 4.9 billion and owner of a company that has 2500 stores across the country is not successful? You have a very different view of what 'success' is to me. ECCOnoob - Yes agree and employing thousands of people who take a wage of him. Lex Luthor - I think everyone's got their own perception of what success is. And for the record there are many different versions of success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomjames Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 You dont think a personal wealth of 4.9 billion and owner of a company that has 2500 stores across the country is not successful? ---------- Post added 15-06-2016 at 19:55 ---------- I have to agree with you about the Panel including its Chairman. However, I must query your use of the word "corruption" What corruption exactly. Green was at this enquiry voluntary. He was not under arrest. He is not facing any criminal charges. He has not been found to be fraudulent nor dishonest. Badly advised - maybe Ill judged - yes. Made a huge mistake - yes Damaged reputation - most definately Needs to make amends - yes Not anywhere in the ball park of "corruption" Of course it's corrupt. Otherwise what is the purpose of the committee hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now