Should Sadiq Khan resign as London Mayor ?

[alchresearch]

He was on Andrew Marr yesterday. I don't think the studio lights agree with him, he was sweating like mad. He was when he appeared on HIGNFY a few months back too.

[Cyclone]

I am delighted you picked up on that.

 

Because that is exactly the same "flawed argument" that crybaby sore loser lefties raise every time the Tories (who won the 2015 election) do something they don't like.

 

All we hear is "the majority of people didn't vote for them" "the election was not fair" "the majority voted against tories" blah blah blah.

 

Irrelevant of the total number of overall votes for or against to other parties - Khan got the majority share on the result.

He therefore won and is therefore in charge.

 

Just like the Tories did in the 2015 election. Majority share. Won. Now in charge.

 

You certainly cant have it both ways.

 

Largest minority you mean?

[MikeFrank]

Don't worry. I saw some buses with UKIP adverts on the side last week. And a fat lot of use it did.

 

Dear boy. Look to Wales, they did well there and many other areas as well.

 

Nice cheap shot.

 

Oh well, may be the fact a MUSLIM won this years Premierleague PFA, A MUSLIM baked the Queen's cake, a MUSLIM became president of the NUS and a MUSLIM became Mayor of London...has got you all stressed out.

 

Oh yeah, we Muslims just don't integrate:hihi:

 

I think the new Mayor would be a better leader than Corbyn. I like him. I also think he will be upsetting some Muslims as well as those who don't like him because he is a Muslim. He is a moderate so fair play for him.

 

He supports gay marriage like me. Do you support his views on this?

[rodnreeluk]

Should Sadiq khan resign as London Mayor ?

 

And then challenge Jeremy Corbyn for the leadership of the Labour party ?

No! - It's the idiots who voted for him that are the problem.

[JFKvsNixon]

No! - It's the idiots who voted for him that are the problem.

 

Democracy eh? Sometimes you just can't trust the people.

[alchemist]

I am delighted you picked up on that.

 

Because that is exactly the same "flawed argument" that crybaby sore loser lefties raise every time the Tories (who won the 2015 election) do something they don't like.

 

All we hear is "the majority of people didn't vote for them" "the election was not fair" "the majority voted against tories" blah blah blah.

 

Irrelevant of the total number of overall votes for or against to other parties - Khan got the majority share on the result.

He therefore won and is therefore in charge.

 

Just like the Tories did in the 2015 election. Majority share. Won. Now in charge.

 

You certainly cant have it both ways.

 

so are you denying that the majority of the country didnt vote for dodgy dave and his bunch of cowboys?