Jump to content

Pensions & the NHS under threat


Recommended Posts

Which really means that pension age has to be linked somehow to average life expectancy, otherwise the burden becomes entirely unsustainable very quickly.

It's a shame that this wasn't recognised decades ago though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which really means that pension age has to be linked somehow to average life expectancy, otherwise the burden becomes entirely unsustainable very quickly.

It's a shame that this wasn't recognised decades ago though.

 

It probably was recognised but raising pension age isn't exactly a vote winner...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which really means that pension age has to be linked somehow to average life expectancy, otherwise the burden becomes entirely unsustainable very quickly.

It's a shame that this wasn't recognised decades ago though.

 

Life expectancy and the age where you still have the ability to work are two very very different numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colleague found an old copy of the Mirror from 1983 in his attic over the weekend. The pre GE scaremongering stated that if the Tories won the election, then the NHS would be dismantled and privatised immediately.

 

Sound familiar?

 

They've tried to privatise a lot of things. Especially things that cost money.

It's effective opposition from the public that has stopped them fully privatising the NHS.

 

Saying that, it was Brown & Labour who sold off chunks of the NHS on high interest PPI deals.

 

---------- Post added 13-06-2016 at 15:17 ----------

 

Which really means that pension age has to be linked somehow to average life expectancy, otherwise the burden becomes entirely unsustainable very quickly.

It's a shame that this wasn't recognised decades ago though.

 

Average life expectancy isnt going up by a huge amount and the age people are healthier and can therefore work & contribute is going up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Life expectancy and the age where you still have the ability to work are two very very different numbers.

 

Yes they are, but life expectancy, and the cost of a medically supported old age are quite closely linked.

We can't somehow magically afford to continue to support the elderly as we all live longer without changing something.

 

---------- Post added 13-06-2016 at 15:29 ----------

 

It probably was recognised but raising pension age isn't exactly a vote winner...

 

Yes, the shortermism that elections breed. No desire to plan for the long term because the only thing that matters is the next election in 5 years time.

 

---------- Post added 13-06-2016 at 15:30 ----------

 

Average life expectancy isnt going up by a huge amount and the age people are healthier and can therefore work & contribute is going up.

 

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lifetables/interim-life-tables/2008-2010/sum-ilt-2008-10.html

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17811732

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they are, but life expectancy, and the cost of a medically supported old age are quite closely linked.

We can't somehow magically afford to continue to support the elderly as we all live longer without changing something.

 

---------- Post added 13-06-2016 at 15:29 ----------

 

 

Yes, we need to pay much more taxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.