haddy Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 It will be passed no matter what as the council will get a nice back hander out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerousedd Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 so long as its planned right it should be ok, hopefully they wont improve the junction like they did down at the new Sainsbury's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astonblade Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Excessive waiting times at the traffic-lights due to access to Morrisions via traffic lights especially at peak traffic times. ....and this is down to our car hating traffic planners. They could sort this out if they wanted to, but then point to the queues being caused by too many cars. Be better if you all caught the bus.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crosser Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 so long as its planned right it should be ok, hopefully they wont improve the junction like they did down at the new Sainsbury's. Oh, do you mean the one at the end of Leppings Lane? If so, that was a great piece of planning (NOT!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerousedd Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Oh, do you mean the one at the end of Leppings Lane? If so, that was a great piece of planning (NOT!) yes that one, suppose it worked great when they simulated it but not such much in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*_ash_* Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 It needs to be a material consideration which includes things like: •Overlooking/loss of privacy •Loss of light or overshadowing •Parking •Highway safety •Traffic •Noise •Effect on listed building and conservation area •Layout and density of building •Design, appearance and materials •Government policy •Disabled persons' access •Proposals in the Development Plan •Previous planning decisions (including appeal decisions) •Nature conservation However, issues such as loss of view, or negative effect on the value of properties are not material considerations. The Hillsborough one has a nature reserve in it, so that's good I was queueing the other day in the drive through and saw a rat running into the hedge with a catch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerousedd Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 hmm tasty rat on a stick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Mod message: Posters have already been asked not to post links containing personal details (names and addresses), however, we are aware that the website does actually contain these details, and it's in the public domain. So it's a bit contradictory. However, we would ask members not to quote excerpts from the planning website which personally identifies people. What they say, I would consider to be ok, but not their names and address, and certainly not a direct link to a specific objection or comment. We always advise members 'not' to publish their own name and address on the forum, in the interests of safety and security. Please don't abuse other people who you may or may not know by posting 'their' names and addresses. It's just common courtesy and bad form really. If there are further instances of this, we will have no choice but to 'pull' the thread. Please do the decent thing and abide by this request. Thanks Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hambeast Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Mod message: Posters have already been asked not to post links containing personal details (names and addresses), however, we are aware that the website does actually contain these details, and it's in the public domain. So it's a bit contradictory. However, we would ask members not to quote excerpts from the planning website which personally identifies people. What they say, I would consider to be ok, but not their names and address, and certainly not a direct link to a specific objection or comment. We always advise members 'not' to publish their own name and address on the forum, in the interests of safety and security. Please don't abuse other people who you may or may not know by posting 'their' names and addresses. It's just common courtesy and bad form really. If there are further instances of this, we will have no choice but to 'pull' the thread. Please do the decent thing and abide by this request. Thanks Pete So are we allow to post links to the homepage of planning applications or not? You don't really make that clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 So are we allow to post links to the homepage of planning applications or not? You don't really make that clear. As far as I'm concerned 'yes'. Sorry about the confusion. But no names please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now