Jump to content

Is it time for Corbyn to resign.


Recommended Posts

Back in the game? dont make me laugh, nothing has changed, she has asked him to resign.....again, thats all they can do ask him to resign, they have found themselves up the creek without a paddle and going nowhere. they tried to bully him out, and he will not resign, and why should he, he was democratically elected. they didnt think he was this tough..and she hasnt got the balls to take him on (literally lol) because she will get her ass kicked. they have made complete fools of themselves :hihi::hihi::hihi::hihi:

Corbyn must be in his potting shed laughing his socks off

 

You're dreaming. He's hiding in his office with Diane Abbot keeping anybody who might vex him away, pooping his pants and praying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry mate....put a lol at the end next time to give me a clue :help:

 

She seems like a good egg. I think she'd make a fine Barnsley Metropolitan County Councillor.

 

But no, not a leader of the Labour Party.

 

---------- Post added 02-07-2016 at 19:55 ----------

 

You're dreaming. He's hiding in his office with Diane Abbot keeping anybody who might vex him away, pooping his pants and praying.

 

Not true. I think he's been at anti-racism rallies recently. Sticking up for people, like we have threads about right here on SF.

 

Give him a little break - he's not a bad man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corbyn is a principled man but his politics are not what will ever get labour elected I'm not a socialist but I do believe the country needs a strong opposition and with him in charge Labour can't deliver it.

 

Yeah, He's a principled man - he's enslaved to his principles. This is a fatal trait in a leader who must mold a strong way forward for all his party. (there's a fancy quote somewhere along the line's of being elected for his views and as soon as he's elected he must allow others to put them forward, never himself.)

 

This involves a certain amount of horse trading, with people and policy's to get the highest amount of support from his Parliamentary Party - that's why the Labour MP's didn't want him. They knew he couldn't do it on one end of the stick and had, justifiably, no confidence that he would be able to do it at the other end. AND why would anyone do it for him when he himself voted against his own party 25% of the time in the last government.

 

Unfortunately the membership are idealistic and the PLP are pragmatic. A prefect storm with the electoral system they have. No-one wants to be the one to challenge him because it would scupper their chances in the following leadership election when an enraged membership would see them as the 'Kingslayer'.

 

It couldn't happen in the Conservative party who only allow 2 names to be put to the membership and they are naturally deferential to authority, (or in ordinary talk arse lickers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She seems like a good egg. I think she'd make a fine Barnsley Metropolitan County Councillor.

 

But no, not a leader of the Labour Party.

 

---------- Post added 02-07-2016 at 19:55 ----------

 

 

Not true. I think he's been at anti-racism rallies recently. Sticking up for people, like we have threads about right here on SF.

 

Give him a little break - he's not a bad man.

 

Right. He's against racism is he? Damage control for anything maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twice he has been ambushed by reporters and he's tried to talk to them, but he's been dragged away by his team. I'd like to hear what he has to say.

 

His team know what he will say, hence they don't want him to say it. It's either because he'll refuse to answer the expected questions about the party leadership or if he does he'll shoot himself in the foot and look totally deluded in a Sepp Blatter kind of way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, He's a principled man - he's enslaved to his principles. This is a fatal trait in a leader who must mold a strong way forward for all his party. (there's a fancy quote somewhere along the line's of being elected for his views and as soon as he's elected he must allow others to put them forward, never himself.)

 

This involves a certain amount of horse trading, with people and policy's to get the highest amount of support from his Parliamentary Party - that's why the Labour MP's didn't want him. They knew he couldn't do it on one end of the stick and had, justifiably, no confidence that he would be able to do it at the other end. AND why would anyone do it for him when he himself voted against his own party 25% of the time in the last government.

 

Unfortunately the membership are idealistic and the PLP are pragmatic. A prefect storm with the electoral system they have. No-one wants to be the one to challenge him because it would scupper their chances in the following leadership election when an enraged membership would see them as the 'Kingslayer'.

 

It couldn't happen in the Conservative party who only allow 2 names to be put to the membership and they are naturally deferential to authority, (or in ordinary talk arse lickers).

 

There will be a stalking horse to act as kingslayer. Once a competition is underway, then Andy Burnham will be free to join in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.