craigmason Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 its been reported on sky that one of the freed immigrants might be mustaf jamma who murdered that police woman full story here http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1220497,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayne67 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Gosh, if this is true, then I think it will definatlely be resignation time, no doubt about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddycoffee Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Turns out that he was considered for deportation but there are no flights to that particular country and they are considered a dangerous state which we wouldn't deport anyone to anyhow, so that won't be the end of Charles Clarke and the story is a red herring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angle20 Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 they are considered a dangerous state which we wouldn't deport anyone to anyhow If someone has trangressed in relation to our laws or potentially poses a threat to our security then we should return that person to their country of origin notwithstanding how "dangerous" it might be. Such a policy might lead other individuals to ponder about this possible consequence if they are minded to behave in a similar manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teabag Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 As far as Clarke is concerned it does not relate to the cases of the people not assessed for deportation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddycoffee Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 If someone has trangressed in relation to our laws or potentially poses a threat to our security then we should return that person to their country of origin notwithstanding how "dangerous" it might be. Such a policy might lead other individuals to ponder about this possible consequence if they are minded to behave in a similar manner. My understanding is that other countries are assesed for their human rights and people are not repatriated to countries where to do so would put their life at risk. There are many countries which people dissappear if they are returned for their body to be found later. This is totally unacceptible, and to send someone back to a place where they might be killed or tortured by the state or other organisation would be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teabag Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 My understanding is that other countries are assesed for their human rights and people are not repatriated to countries where to do so would put their life at risk. There are many countries which people dissappear if they are returned for their body to be found later. This is totally unacceptible, and to send someone back to a place where they might be killed or tortured by the state or other organisation would be wrong. Right on! Come on Heir Angle get typing:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matsalleh Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 My understanding is that other countries are assesed for their human rights and people are not repatriated to countries where to do so would put their life at risk. There are many countries which people dissappear if they are returned for their body to be found later. This is totally unacceptible, and to send someone back to a place where they might be killed or tortured by the state or other organisation would be wrong. So what about the ones who have been released by accident or negligence and re-offended? Better not to let 'em in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnomi Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 its been reported on sky that one of the freed immigrants might be mustaf jamma who murdered that police woman full story here http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1220497,00.html Think the key word here is 'might' racist sensationalism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garryn Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Think the key word here is 'might' racist sensationalism Speculation - yes sensationalism - maybe racist - why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.