Jump to content

Proxima B - To probe or not to probe?


To proxima B or not to prxima B?  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. To proxima B or not to prxima B?

    • Yes, let's get cracking
      6
    • Yeah, but wait for better technology
      4
    • No way, we should fear what's out there
      1


Recommended Posts

90 light years instead of 4... That's going to take a lot longer.

 

I'd start with the close target and prove that the technology is viable before going for the one 20 times as far away!

 

Yeah, I know, but say they are an intelligent Kardashev Type II civilisation. The probe might not need to get all the way there before they come and say hi (on the basis that the signal was directed and they might be monitoring us for a response).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we should forget about Proxima b and send a probe to HD 164595 b instead.

http://observer.com/2016/08/not-a-drill-seti-is-investigating-a-possible-extraterrestrial-signal-from-deep-space/

 

Tabloid overhype I'm afraid.

 

SETI Institute damps down 'wow!' signal report from Russia

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/30/seti_institute_damps_down_wow_signal_report_from_russia/

 

it could feasibly be “interference from a passing satellite”.

 

“It doesn’t even look like terrestrial interference has been ruled out — sometimes something as simple as a spark from a power line can cause radio interference that can mess with telescopes.

 

With only one blip like this, seen by one telescope, it’s really impossible to know what it might have come from.”

 

unexpected signals are a common occurrence, and so far haven't needed extra-terrestrials to explain them
Edited by alchresearch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know, but say they are an intelligent Kardashev Type II civilisation. The probe might not need to get all the way there before they come and say hi (on the basis that the signal was directed and they might be monitoring us for a response).

 

If it's a real signal and not a bit of random noise, then the quickest way to get a response would be to send a directed signal back. No need for a probe at 0.2C when we can send a signal at 1.0C. We might get a reply within 200 years that way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.