The end of the Labour party

[banjodeano]

I suppose the most frightening aspect of JCs tenure as labour leader is that he doesn't seem to see winning a general election as important. Such is the problem with having a leader who thinks politics is about protest, that come the disaster for labour that will occur at GE2020, he won't see it as cause to step down.

 

on what basis do you assume that?

[unbeliever]

on what basis do you assume that?

 

Have you seen his personal poll ratings?

Have you seen the party ratings under his leadership?

 

You think they're fake don't you?

[banjodeano]

Have you seen his personal poll ratings?

Have you seen the party ratings under his leadership?

 

You think they're fake don't you?

 

but that doesnt answer the question that i asked?

[unbeliever]

but that doesnt answer the question that i asked?

 

If he thought it was important for Labour to win the GE, he'd resign.

Unless he's operating under the delusion that they can win with him as leader.

[banjodeano]

If he thought it was important for Labour to win the GE, he'd resign.

Unless he's operating under the delusion that they can win with him as leader.

He is the best bet Labour have, we have tried labour lite and it didnt work

[BoroB]

He is the best bet Labour have, we have tried labour lite and it didnt work

 

On behalf of a non labour voter, I agree he's the best. Long may he reign.

[unbeliever]

He is the best bet Labour have,

 

 

No. No he's not.

 

we have tried labour lite and it didnt work

 

Labour lite is the only thing which worked.

First you chose the wrong Miliband, then you picked Corbyn rather than somebody sensible.

Now you're stuck.

 

It is Tory lite which currently dominates parliament. This is the era of "lite".

[BoroB]

No. No he's not.

 

 

 

Labour lite is the only thing which worked.

First you chose the wrong Miliband, then you picked Corbyn rather than somebody sensible.

Now you're stuck.

 

It is Tory lite which currently dominates parliament. This is the era of "lite".

 

If only David had beaten the goliath's of the unions.

[banjodeano]

No. No he's not.

 

 

 

Labour lite is the only thing which worked.

First you chose the wrong Miliband, then you picked Corbyn rather than somebody sensible.

Now you're stuck.

 

It is Tory lite which currently dominates parliament. This is the era of "lite".

 

Ok mate.....not gonna waste a Saturday evening covering old ground...have a good evening, im just about to watch strictly :help: i am forced to watch it :)

[unbeliever]

If only David had beaten the goliath's of the unions.

 

I've said this already in the thread, but why do they get a vote?

Other party donors don't get a vote unless they're also members. Why don't union members become Labour members if they want to vote? In fact why don't they become members if they want to give money to Labour?

Why does a union affiliated to Labour need anything other than to go around telling it's members that they could do worse than join the Labour party?

It all seems rather dodgy.