'Locker Room Banter'

[Petminder]

Sad to note that Trump supporters on here are beginning to sound like apologists for sexual assault. Support Trump if you will, but please do not insult victims of sexual assault.

 

So in your opinion if I claim you sexually assaulted me I should be believed by everyone and you should be convicted, or would you also like to be believed when you deny it?

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 18:27 ----------

 

Don't assume nationalism cannot be socialism. The BNP are most definitely socialist. Their policies involve renationalising the trains! That is a socialist policy as are many more of theirs.

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 18:04 ----------

 

 

What the hell are you talking about? Of course it's possible for someone to use fear to get you to oblige. Just like Trump could. Jesus christ, we get some right ones on here don't we?

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 18:05 ----------

 

 

Some? So not all? So some of them are telling the truth? In which case Trump is guilty of sexual assault and yet you are STILL defending him?

 

How many women have claimed he made them afraid to say no?

 

You don't know that they are all telling the truth, you just want to believe that they are, but you are free to believe anything you want to believe.

[Cyclone]

So in your opinion if I claim you sexually assaulted me I should be believed by everyone and you should be convicted, or would you also like to be believed when you deny it?

 

Presumably you'll need to have actually met him at some point... And if he was previously just bragging about how he likes to sexually assault women then you'd think an investigation would at least be launched, wouldn't you?

Or if you ever do have to complain about being sexually assaulted to the police, should they just let it go when the accused says they didn't do it?

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 19:30 ----------

 

My point is that in my opinion Trump and some of his accusers are lying or exaggerating.

 

You've been defending him from the start, first it was just banter, now the accusers are making up, despite his bragging about it...

[Petminder]

Presumably you'll need to have actually met him at some point... And if he was previously just bragging about how he likes to sexually assault women then you'd think an investigation would at least be launched, wouldn't you?

Or if you ever do have to complain about being sexually assaulted to the police, should they just let it go when the accused says they didn't do it?

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 19:30 ----------

 

 

You've been defending him from the start, first it was just banter, now the accusers are making up, despite his bragging about it...

 

You admitted to being violent and I just said violent people like you are worse than Trump.

[Cyclone]

You're still trying to use my banter as a distraction from Trumps claimed sexual assault. Amazing.

[Petminder]

You're still trying to use my banter as a distraction from Trumps claimed sexual assault. Amazing.

 

No, just saying people that punch other people in the face are worse than people to touch and kiss other people without asking.

[Cyclone]

No you're not. You're claiming that my throw away comment about being punched is somehow worse than Trumps claims that he actually did sexually assault people, and the subsequent claims by women that he assaulted them.

 

Your continuing claims that assault is somehow worse than sexual assault are bizarre.

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 19:50 ----------

 

No men that I know would talk like that about women. Not the least because all the other men would punch them in the gob. How is claiming to have sexually assaulted people "a kind of release"...

 

See, "would". Not "have". See the difference there. Trump claims to have actually sexually assaulted women. And multiple women agree.

[Petminder]

No you're not. You're claiming that my throw away comment about being punched is somehow worse than Trumps claims that he actually did sexually assault people, and the subsequent claims by women that he assaulted them.

 

Your continuing claims that assault is somehow worse than sexual assault are bizarre.

 

You said if one of your friends said what Trump said all the other men would punch him in the face, that statement includes you if you are a man.

 

Punching someone in the face is far worse than kissing someone, but you already know that.

[Bob Arctor]

You said if one of your friends said what Trump said all the other men would punch him in the face, that statement includes you if you are a man.

 

Punching someone in the face is far worse than kissing someone, but you already know that.

 

Oh give it a rest for chuff's sake. You're becoming the Forum's sexual assault apologist.

[Petminder]

Oh give it a rest for chuff's sake. You're becoming the Forum's sexual assault apologist.

 

I prefer a men to kiss me than punch me in the Gob, therefor I would feel safer with Trump than Cyclone.

[Cyclone]

You said if one of your friends said what Trump said all the other men would punch him in the face, that statement includes you if you are a man.

 

Punching someone in the face is far worse than kissing someone, but you already know that.

 

Sexual assault is far worse than assault. Apparently you don't know that.

Nor can you distinguish between forum banter and reality.

 

---------- Post added 21-10-2016 at 20:07 ----------

 

 

Punching someone in the face is far worse than kissing someone, but you already know that.

 

Do you habitually make claims of having sexually assaulted people? Because that was (if you can remember) the criteria for the "punch in the gob".

And you've still not grasped "would" and "have". My banter about what "would" be done, compared to his claims about what he has done. But no skin off my nose, I wouldn't feel safe in your company, you might start grabbing at me.