Cyclone Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 They shouldnt have been there in the first place. Maybe if the French had shown a backbone and sent them packing back where they came from , then there wouldnt be the problems in Calais. Yeah, they should be fine in Aleppo shouldn't they. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:25 ---------- So we let them in and every time we don't give them what they want they riot,like what's been said shouldn't be there. Or, more accurately, we don't let them in, and then when we bulldoze the place where they're staying they get upset. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:26 ---------- i dont no one person who thinks any of them should be allowed to enter the uk. Figures. People tend to be friends with those of a similar background, intelligence and political persuasion. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:27 ---------- The good thing to come from this from the UK`S perspective is they are being moved and made to apply for asylum in FRANCE . The system should be changed entirely. Apply for asylum wherever, but end up where the EU distributes you. Distribution based on population of the host nations. So Greece doesn't get overwhelmed with immigrants, but the UK has to take it's fair share for a change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 The good thing to come from this from the UK`S perspective is they are being moved and made to apply for asylum in FRANCE . And once they have that then they can come over here just as they intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukdobby Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) Yeah, they should be fine in Aleppo shouldn't they. So out of the 10000 in the jungle how many are from Syria and then how many are from Aleppo? I don't mind us taking them in if its warranted and they're in danger. Edited October 24, 2016 by nikki-red Fixed quote tags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yeah, they should be fine in Aleppo shouldn't they. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:25 ---------- Or, more accurately, we don't let them in, and then when we bulldoze the place where they're staying they get upset. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:26 ---------- Figures. People tend to be friends with those of a similar background, intelligence and political persuasion. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:27 ---------- The system should be changed entirely. Apply for asylum wherever, but end up where the EU distributes you. Distribution based on population of the host nations. So Greece doesn't get overwhelmed with immigrants, but the UK has to take it's fair share for a change. Don't you think we have taken our fair share already, our population has gone up by 3 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 And once they have that then they can come over here just as they intended. Only if we let them in , which of course we dont have to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin6 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yeah, they should be fine in Aleppo shouldn't they. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:25 ---------- Or, more accurately, we don't let them in, and then when we bulldoze the place where they're staying they get upset. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:26 ---------- Figures. People tend to be friends with those of a similar background, intelligence and political persuasion. ---------- Post added 23-10-2016 at 19:27 ---------- The system should be changed entirely. Apply for asylum wherever, but end up where the EU distributes you. Distribution based on population of the host nations. So Greece doesn't get overwhelmed with immigrants, but the UK has to take it's fair share for a change. Fair share? The UK takes in more than 600,000 immigrants a year and rising, so after 5 mullion in the last 10 years you can see why we are getting miffed about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yeah, they should be fine in Aleppo shouldn't they. . The majority of those in the Jungle would have never heard of Aleppo . Those in Calais are economic migrants , a lot of them from africa , iraq and afghan . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Fair share? The UK takes in more than 600,000 immigrants a year and rising, i imagine its a lot less than the likes of france, sweden and germany take in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horribleblob Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 ...The UK takes in more than 600,000 immigrants a year and rising, so after 5 million in the last 10 years... To give a broader picture: according to Migration Watch, in the year to March 2016, immigration was 633,000. Emigration stood at 306,000, thus net migration to the UK was 327,000. The figures indicate net migration at well below 5 million over the past 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 To give a broader picture: according to Migration Watch, in the year to March 2016, immigration was 633,000. Emigration stood at 306,000, thus net migration to the UK was 327,000. The figures indicate net migration at well below 5 million over the past 10 years. the better picture can be take from NI numbers issue around 1.2 million isued in 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now