Randy Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 You could say the same about anyone in social housing in that case. None are paying the trust cost of their home and many get it free if they are on benefits. Its the system that needs changing. Maybe we should look at people who cant afford to look after their children as failing and take their children off them. Would that be better? Maybe we should stop irresponsible parents from overbreeding and taking responsibility for funding their own lifestyle choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansheff Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Just reading the article, waiting for someone to post something about his wife wearing a Wednesday top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomgeg Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Maybe we should stop irresponsible parents from overbreeding and taking responsibility for funding their own lifestyle choices. Spot on, and instead of moving them into houses in expensive areas find them a property in somewhere like Page Hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santo Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Maybe we should stop irresponsible parents from overbreeding and taking responsibility for funding their own lifestyle choices. Are you suggesting that the state should sterilise the poor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Are you suggesting that the state should sterilise the poor? No, I'm saying that people who have kids they can't afford to keep should not be rewarded for doing so by being given generous benefits and big houses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santo Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 No, I'm saying that people who have kids they can't afford to keep should not be rewarded for doing so by being given generous benefits and big houses. So their kids should be allowed to starve or be taken into care by the state? You are aware he works a few hours a week and is training to be a nurse correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 So their kids should be allowed to starve or be taken into care by the state? You are aware he works a few hours a week and is training to be a nurse correct? I wonder why he didn't stay in France? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santo Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I wonder why he didn't stay in France? Dunno. Why did he leave Cameroon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomgeg Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I wonder why he didn't stay in France? Probably because he wouldn't get away with it. We've got the left moaning about housing shortages, NHS waiting lists and and over subscribed schools, then they will defend the benefit breeders and bleat on about the kids suffering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santo Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Probably because he wouldn't get away with it. We've got the left moaning about housing shortages, NHS waiting lists and and over subscribed schools, then they will defend the benefit breeders and bleat on about the kids suffering. Get away with what? Claiming the same benefits as other people can? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now