phil752 Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Why is your world of unsecure low skilled employment and low pay more real than my world? To be honest mine is far from it, however why do some people try to justifies their argument by demeaning others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 I said that every on was capable of judgement, you said they were very simple. In which post? Ofc everyone is capable of judgement? Where does saying some people are simple or gullible conflict with that? The £350m being the example. Easily checked and you could see it was untrue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 In which post? Ofc everyone is capable of judgement? Where does saying some people are simple or gullible conflict with that? The £350m being the example. Easily checked and you could see it was untrue. Many people did not see through them because some people are very simple and others believe what they wnat to believe as soon as they hear it becayse they are gullible. Look at some of the people on this thread. there you go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Many people did not see through them because some people are very simple and others believe what they wnat to believe as soon as they hear it becayse they are gullible. Look at some of the people on this thread. there you go I dont see your point? Are you denying the fact that some people are very simple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petminder Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 That site has such 'quality' analysis they think Rio Olympic success is down to Brexit. Didn't say it was quality, just interesting. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:39 ---------- I dont see your point? Are you denying the fact that some people are very simple? Maybe it would have been better if you had said there are gullible and simple people on both sides of the vote instead of just implying the the simple people are just on the brexit side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Didn't say it was quality, just interesting. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:39 ---------- Maybe it would have been better if you had said there are gullible and simple people on both sides of the vote instead of just implying the the simple people are just on the brexit side. Quite right but it is a card i get fed up with remoners playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Didn't say it was quality, just interesting. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:39 ---------- Maybe it would have been better if you had said there are gullible and simple people on both sides of the vote instead of just implying the the simple people are just on the brexit side. Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Quite right but it is a card i get fed up with remoners playing Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petminder Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue? I think the CPS should be putting their time to better use, let them deal with crime and let the electorate deal with dishonest MP's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue?[/quote Fact £350 m is what we are indebted to the EU for. Is the rebate variable? If France and a few others goth their way it would be removed. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:53 ---------- Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue?[/quote Fact £350 m is what we are indebted to the EU for. Is the rebate variable? If France and a few others got their way it would be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
999tigger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue?[/quote Fact £350 m is what we are indebted to the EU for. Is the rebate variable? If France and a few others goth their way it would be removed. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:53 ---------- Which is quite reasonable, but not soemthing I said and I saw no need as the discussion had been about the £350m claim and the CPS reviewing it. I fail to see what phil752 is going on about. There will ofc have been simple people on both sides. Of there were claims by the remainers that were actually lies and in breach of electoral laws, then they too should be reported to the CPS to see in there have been infringments. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 19:46 ---------- Nope your points are mind boggling. What card have I played which is in fact untrue?[/quote Fact £350 m is what we are indebted to the EU for. Is the rebate variable? If France and a few others got their way it would be removed. No idea what you have done with that post. I went to the trouble of detailing previously how the £350m figure was reached and why it was a lie. Your response above shows you still havent grasped why this is. Go and read the links then you might appreciate why the argument was false and why a complaint was made. ---------- Post added 08-11-2016 at 20:00 ---------- I think the CPS should be putting their time to better use, let them deal with crime and let the electorate deal with dishonest MP's. The CPS have no choice in the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now