altus Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 What time did Peter Hain reveal the name? It probably doesn't matter now but it may be an idea for the mods to remove any posts on this thread before that time! None of the posts on the tread before Hain revealed his name were related to the issue of the injunction. The Guardian reported it at 15:12 which is earlier than alchresearch's post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Top Cats Hat Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 None of the posts on the tread before Hain revealed his name were related to the issue of the injunction. The Guardian reported it at 15:12 which is earlier than alchresearch's post. The thread title reveals his name. There have been 'Phillip Green' threads all over the internet today. Not suggesting that this is one of them but it's always wise to be cautious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 None of the posts on the tread before Hain revealed his name were related to the issue of the injunction. The Guardian reported it at 15:12 which is earlier than alchresearch's post. No surprise it wasn't a Tory that named him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Gee Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I'm a bit disappointed because I already knew he was a massive scumbag, I was hoping some new scumbag would be revealed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padders Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 The rich get richer... morals don't come into it... Yep, nothing surprises me (and you) anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 I'm a bit disappointed because I already knew he was a massive scumbag, I was hoping some new scumbag would be revealed. Well let's face it there are still plenty out there to chose from. Phillip Green is a dispicable man. Why is he is still a 'Sir?' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EUCLID11 Posted October 25, 2018 Share Posted October 25, 2018 Well let's face it there are still plenty out there to chose from. Phillip Green is a dispicable man. Why is he is still a 'Sir?' Why has he kept his knighthood ???? Its 'cos he probably knows where the bodies are buried. Knock him down and he'll take a lot more with him. That is alledged to be the reason why Jimmy Saville got away with his atrocities for so long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert smith Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 The rich get richer... morals don't come into it... That's how its been from time immemorial , and how this Country is run by the ruling classes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockdoctor Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 Good old Peter Hain. Sir Philip Green named in Parliament as businessman at centre of Britain's #MeToo scandal https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/25/sir-philip-green-named-parliament-businessman-centre-britains/ The high court judges will have had good reasons to grant the injunctions. Peter Hain was wrong to name Sir Philip Green in Parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted October 26, 2018 Share Posted October 26, 2018 The high court judges will have had good reasons to grant the injunctions. Peter Hain was wrong to name Sir Philip Green in Parliament. Why was he wrong to do so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now