Obelix Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 no...he smashed her into the long grass Considering your former record on revisionism I'll take that as being that May actually cremated Corbyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mort Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Keep it civil please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I accept your apology for your ignorant comment. Deluded as well as a sockpuppet then Wheres the ignore button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacktari Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Deluded as well as a sockpuppet then Wheres the ignore button. We shall get on I can see. However I think Jeremy has his good points. At least he resembles Alec Guinness, and not Cruella de Ville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_bloke Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 no...he smashed her into the long grass Not really, even the Guardian only considered it a score draw. I wouldn't consider him smashing anything apart from unpopularity contests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacktari Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Not really, even the Guardian only considered it a score draw. I wouldn't consider him smashing anything apart from unpopularity contests. I think his heart is in fairness and decency. These things however are not required in modern politics. Load-mouthed self assertion , without ability, seems to be all that is required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banjodeano Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Not really, even the Guardian only considered it a score draw. I wouldn't consider him smashing anything apart from unpopularity contests. please tell me which media outlet would ever give Corbyn the edge? but did you actually watch it? she was well and truly out batted today, she was totally on the defensive and even had to lower herself to attack the Red Cross... i wonder if she is also going to attack all the other academics who are putting the boot into her over her handling of the NHS... Even one of her own MP's is putting the knife in... http://www.thecanary.co/2017/01/04/theresa-may-just-savaged-nhs-tory-health-chair/ and its only going to get worse for her... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopkins Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 To achieve what? If it's to get more tax then you'll need to look very carefully at how best to do that as it's diminishing returns. If it's simply to make a point then go ahead but you might end up reducing tax returns which I don't think benefits anyone. They were there before until Maggie cut them for her fat cat mates weren't they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin-H Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 They were there before until Maggie cut them for her fat cat mates weren't they. Yes and they were a disaster at the time. The richest are paying a higher percentage of total tax revenue than they ever have before. Increasing tax rates doesn't mean they will pay more - tax revenues dropped when the 50% rate was introduced. Read up on the Laffer Curve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 But the Laffer curve is not an excuse to abandon any pretence at controlling C level salaries and the number of times greater than the average that they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now