Jump to content

Failed housing policy?


Recommended Posts

Selling 2 houses at a profit of £10000 each is better than selling one at a profit of £15000.

Just think about it. Where in the market do things actually work in the way you're suggesting?

 

Diamonds. De Beer's actively buy up as many diamond mines as they can solely so they can control the supply of them to create demand. De Beer's model is risky though, it wouldn't take many mines to destroy their supply and demand numbers and mess it all up.

 

Same as the housing market. A builder *could* not build a house or keep it in the hopes that it's value rises for more profit later on, but there is nothing to guarantee that rise. Bird in the hand and all. Some large home builders could probably afford to take the risk but why would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diamonds. De Beer's actively buy up as many diamond mines as they can solely so they can control the supply of them to create demand. De Beer's model is risky though, it wouldn't take many mines to destroy their supply and demand numbers and mess it all up.

 

Same as the housing market. A builder *could* not build a house or keep it in the hopes that it's value rises for more profit later on, but there is nothing to guarantee that rise. Bird in the hand and all. Some large home builders could probably afford to take the risk but why would they?

 

So it occurs in monopolies.

You could also have chosen oil, where OPEC (at least until recently) could effectively game the market.

 

I really don't think there's a monopoly or cartel in house building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tory government might talk a good talk on housing policy but it really isn't in their interest to detract from the status quo. Social engineering by the backdoor.

 

In the contrary. With Labour self-destructing st every opportunity and in perpetual crisis over Brexit, all their traditional voters are up for grabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think there's a monopoly or cartel in house building.

 

I'm not so sure about that in Sheffield. SCC have entered into a partnership with Keepmoat and Greater Places Housing and set up a housing company. That company then gets its land from SCC to build houses on but that land is not tendered out to others. In a sense that housing company is working like a monopoly in that it is restricting competition from others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the contrary. With Labour self-destructing st every opportunity and in perpetual crisis over Brexit, all their traditional voters are up for grabs.

 

The Tories aren't gonna fight for our votes, they've made that perfectly clear. Their priorities are dahn saaf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it occurs in monopolies.

You could also have chosen oil, where OPEC (at least until recently) could effectively game the market.

 

I really don't think there's a monopoly or cartel in house building.

 

Me neither, but you asked for where it happens.

 

---------- Post added 10-02-2017 at 09:59 ----------

 

I'm not so sure about that in Sheffield. SCC have entered into a partnership with Keepmoat and Greater Places Housing and set up a housing company. That company then gets its land from SCC to build houses on but that land is not tendered out to others. In a sense that housing company is working like a monopoly in that it is restricting competition from others.

 

That's interesting. Do you have a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here you go.

 

New report shows immigration from outside Europe over the Labour government years cost the public purse billions of pounds, while recent migration from inside Europe generated a £4 billion surplus

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11209234/Immigration-from-outside-Europe-cost-120-billion.html

 

Sorry its a Torygraph link.

 

One day someone will release some post 2011 figures using the same assumptions and calculations as that study; good chance it won't paint such a pretty picture. A more recent study suggests that contributions slump when you include migrants from more recent EU countries.

 

https://fullfact.org/immigration/do-eu-immigrants-contribute-134-every-1-they-receive/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone seems to be blaming immigrants for constraining housing supply. The same immigrants for suppressing salaries in the jobs market. When will you losers admit that you fail at life and therefore can't get a well paid enough job to afford your own home. Owning your own home is by no means a right it is earned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone seems to be blaming immigrants for constraining housing supply. The same immigrants for suppressing salaries in the jobs market. When will you losers admit that you fail at life and therefore can't get a well paid enough job to afford your own home. Owning your own home is by no means a right it is earned.
so companies only paying minimum wage/ wages topped up with benefits and banks not lending to these people has nothing to do with it eh:huh:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.