WarPig Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 (edited) SCC will probably have a court application for removal of the tents. Let's hope so. ---------- Post added 22-02-2017 at 07:27 ---------- It seems that some 'do gooders' have provided the tents, they get occupied in the evening by the 'activist/protest' type of person who later leave and go home at the end of the night, leaving just a couple of folk in the tents who may or may not be homeless. They have even started to destroy each others tents. The real homeless want nothing to do with the fiasco, preferring to sleep in the town centre with their begging cup next to them, mostly keeping themselves to themselves. And then you have the alcoholic street drinkers that litter the town centre with their begging, arguing and fighting amongst themselves all evening, and growling at passers by before then going home for the night, whilst the genuine homeless keep out of their way and keep themselves to themselves. That just about sums it up. Now, where are those tent clearance teams? Edited February 22, 2017 by WarPig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Post #86 warpig, you claimed you could answer the simple question you'd been asked. We're still waiting for you to prove it by doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarPig Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Post #86 warpig, you claimed you could answer the simple question you'd been asked. We're still waiting for you to prove it by doing so. This is obviously frustrating you isn't it I did answer the question, my reply was yes. And I dont think that 'we're still waiting' is necessarily correct. I think it is just you that is waiting, nobody else really cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Can you answer the question? Yes... Well, go ahead, don't be shy, answer it. ---------- Post added 22-02-2017 at 14:28 ---------- Are you disputing that the numbers have increased? Despite saying that "yes" you can answer this, you have continued to avoid to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarPig Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 My answer to whether I'm disputing the figures is yes. Not sure why you found this so difficult Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hicksy3 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 As long as that eyesore which is the squat is removed ASAP , thats the priority. Are you after getting flats for them? That why you're looking for a flat, excepting (sic) DSS in another thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Are you after getting flats for them? That why you're looking for a flat, excepting (sic) DSS in another thread? I saw the advert too, I wonder if penny has fallen on hard times? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 My answer to whether I'm disputing the figures is yes. Not sure why you found this so difficult Okay, good. I found it difficult because you refused to answer for multiple pages. So, I've provided my sources for the assertion. Government figures, charity figures, surveys, they all agree that the number of homeless rough sleepers have increased. What's your counter evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarPig Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 (edited) Okay, good. I found it difficult because you refused to answer for multiple pages. I did answer it with a simple 'Yes'. Didn't you see it? ---------- Post added 23-02-2017 at 14:17 ---------- So, I've provided my sources for the assertion. Government figures, charity figures, surveys, they all agree that the number of homeless rough sleepers have increased. What's your counter evidence? To answer that, maybe I could quote your good self.. Why should I tell you?....I don't think the rules of debate mean that I need to explain to you why that is. So why now must I tell you? You couldn't even qualify your yourself at the time about why the numbers had increased, so you must have googled it afterwards in the hope you were correct?... I never claimed to have an answer as to why they have increased, so why do you expect me to explain it? Edited February 23, 2017 by WarPig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire 53 Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Recap on this, and then tell me what the name for it is.......... 'Can you answer the question' 'we're all waiting for you to do so.' 'warpig hasn't answered a single question he was asked.' 'we're still waiting for you to provide an answer.' Go ahead, don't be shy, answer it.' 'you have continued to avoid doing so etc.' 'you refused to answer for multiple pages.' Then this from the above author......... 'Why should I tell you ?' 'I don't think the rules of debate mean that I should explain to you.' What did those doctors staying at Fawlty Towers say ...'There's enough material there for a psychiatric conference !' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts