NigelFargate Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 UKIP members seem to be as charmless as Nuttall. One is caught urinating on a fence and trying to force his way into a pensioner's house while out leafletting for Nuttall. http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/video-ukip-member-caught-on-cctv-urinating-and-trying-to-push-way-into-oap-s-home-in-stoke-central/story-30147297-detail/story.html The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtkate Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either. It's a fight to the bottom in Stoke isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either. I don't think he's urinated on anyone's fence in broad daylight or forced senior members of his own party to quit because of his lies about the most sensitive issue in Liverpool for decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelFargate Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 I don't think he's urinated on anyone's fence in broad daylight or forced senior members of his own party to quit because of his lies about the most sensitive issue in Liverpool for decades. Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall. So the way you support Nuttall's lies is to tell a few more. There's UKIP for you. If you want to defend UKIP you'd be better off not supporting a leader who has become a national joke. If Nuttall loses Stoke both he and UKIP are finished because he has set everything on winning the white working class from Labour. If he fails to win Stoke because of his own personal incompetence it's bye bye Nuttall. You ought to think about that instead of telling even more lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelFargate Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 So the way you support Nuttall's lies is to tell a few more. There's UKIP for you. If you want to defend UKIP you'd be better off not supporting a leader who has become a national joke. If Nuttall loses Stoke both he and UKIP are finished because he has set everything on winning the white working class from Labour. If he fails to win Stoke because of his own personal incompetence it's bye bye Nuttall. You ought to think about that instead of telling even more lies. I am neither defending Nuttall nor UKIP. Could you care to inform me what 'lies' I have told? I am pointing out to the gloatfesters on this thread that there are many other politicians who have told lies for political or financial gain - for example, MPs who 'flipped' their second homes during the expenses scandal years in order to claim huge amounts in mortgage relief and to avoid CGT. Or those who told us lies about WMDs (did all of the MPs actually believe the official narrative?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 I am neither defending Nuttall nor UKIP. Could you care to inform me what 'lies' I have told? You said that the Labour candidate is of an even lower calibre that Nuttall. He'd have to be a paedophile to manage that but you offered no evidence. You're only interested in defending the indefensible by saying that others are even more indefensible. It won't wash but if you'd care to wash that pensioner's back fence that would be nice of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalga Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall. So the answer you have is to make up a story of what might have been if things had been different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted February 20, 2017 Author Share Posted February 20, 2017 lol, Paul Nuttall on the 6 o'clock News accusing others of scraping the barrel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Arctor Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 How incongruous it would be for him to enter Parliament, that temple of truth and moral probity, where terminological inexactitudes, self-serving statements of questionable accuracy and outright falsehoods and have never been uttered. But the point that UKIP keep trying to make is that they are different, that they represent a change from the status quo. Now you, an apparent supporter, are telling us that they are just the same as everyone else. That does appear to be true. Which makes voting for them pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now