Hairyloon Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 Who is trying to discredit the result? I am for one. Not the result of the referendum, but the resultant incoherence from Parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentP Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 I am for one. Not the result of the referendum, but the resultant incoherence from Parliament. Well yes, but it's never a strong point regardless is it! The problem I have is that they talk in terms that make it difficult to understand, facts figures and percentages, no clear answers. The average joe has no chance of deciphering the waffle. Talk in terms that people can follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puggie Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 "This is about the legal process, not politics" said Gina Miller outside the Supreme Court. Funny how she's now leading a campaign to encourage tactical voting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockdoctor Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 "This is about the legal process, not politics" said Gina Miller outside the Supreme Court. Funny how she's now leading a campaign to encourage tactical voting Both Andrew Neil and Ann Widdecombe exposed Gina Miller as the liar she is, during the This Week television program on Thursday evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 "This is about the legal process, not politics" said Gina Miller outside the Supreme Court. Funny how she's now leading a campaign to encourage tactical voting Only a fool would stick to one party, what ever the circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 "This is about the legal process, not politics" said Gina Miller outside the Supreme Court. Funny how she's now leading a campaign to encourage tactical voting It's just a new phase. She is not trying to prevent Brexit. She is trying to prevent hard Brexit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairyloon Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 The problem I have is that they talk in terms that make it difficult to understand, facts figures and percentages, no clear answers. The average joe has no chance of deciphering the waffle. Talk in terms that people can follow. This is why we have a representative democracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentP Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 This is why we have a representative democracy. But to have an inkling of what their intentions are would be nice. The truth is they dare not dumb it down because they risk being understood. Heaven forbid that people decide on what they actually hear and not just vote for A Party just because... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairyloon Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 But to have an inkling of what their intentions are would be nice... But we have now established that their intentions are irrelevant as they'll happily go back on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentP Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 But we have now established that their intentions are irrelevant as they'll happily go back on them. This is VERY true, and it makes me happy that I didn't base my decision on any promises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts