Brooker11 Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 (edited) I'm still unclear about what your problem is. Can you clarify? ---------- Post added 16-11-2018 at 22:55 ---------- If you read my post properly you will see that the current high profile case was referenced in a quote. To mention that one without mentioning others is pure deflection of the issue. I can certainly clarify, there's currently one of the largest scale investigations (Operation Stovewood) happening a few miles down the road, its significant as it involves 1 in 6 of the minority male population of that area, I'd like to hear your views on such alarming statistics, its not too much to ask. Edited November 17, 2018 by Brooker11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broakham Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 I can certainly clarify, there's currently one of the largest scale investigations (Operation Stovewood) happening a few miles down the road, its significant as it involves 1 in 6 of the minority male population of that area, I'd like to hear your views on such alarming statistics, its not too much to ask. I am well aware of Operation Stovewood. However, I fail to see why you think I should give an opinion of it before I am allowed to post about another conviction where I was curious about the apparent lenience of the sentence. Are you trying to suggest that there is a hidden agenda to my post? If so, just get on with it and ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooker11 Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 I am well aware of Operation Stovewood. However, I fail to see why you think I should give an opinion of it before I am allowed to post about another conviction where I was curious about the apparent lenience of the sentence. Are you trying to suggest that there is a hidden agenda to my post? If so, just get on with it and ask me. I’m just curious why you chose to ignore and continue to do so the current biggest case that affects the immediate vicinity, odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broakham Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 I’m just curious why you chose to ignore and continue to do so the current biggest case that affects the immediate vicinity, odd. You are still implying that I must have an ulterior motive for not posting a comment about Operation Stovewood. You clearly have something on your mind so why don't you give up on the innuendo and tell us what it is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scrapper Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 another 30 to stand trial from huddersfield,next september at leeds crown court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 I’m just curious why you chose to ignore and continue to do so the current biggest case that affects the immediate vicinity, odd. I thinks yours and others selective outrage is being pointed out. All Sex offenders are scumbags but as seen on SF many times it’s the ethnic ones that cause the most outrage for some reason.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nig30 Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Can any moderator who reads this please explain to me why my thread and post were recently removed for merely asking what had happened to another thread in this subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaati Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Post(s) have been removed because they could be considered to breach our Terms of Service or Forum Rules. If you have a query with moderation, this can be taken to the Helpdesk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooker11 Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 I thinks yours and others selective outrage is being pointed out. All Sex offenders are scumbags but as seen on SF many times it’s the ethnic ones that cause the most outrage for some reason.... They probably cause the most outrage due to the unprecedented numbers involved compared with the actual amount of men of that ethnicity (1 in 6 under investigation in Rotherham), the fact that these cases are appearing on an almost weekly basis (another 30 on trial in Huddersfield next year) the fact that authorities failed to act and the fact that the news by its wording is still trying to allay the truth. Is that enough reasons for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinBak Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 They probably cause the most outrage due to the unprecedented numbers involved compared with the actual amount of men of that ethnicity (1 in 6 under investigation in Rotherham), the fact that these cases are appearing on an almost weekly basis (another 30 on trial in Huddersfield next year) the fact that authorities failed to act and the fact that the news by its wording is still trying to allay the truth. Is that enough reasons for you? It's enough reasons for Many folks here. Me as well... BUT...The last time i mentioned 'Numbers and Ethnicity'..i was banned for three days.! Can't win.! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts