Dimple Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Makes you wonder why, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-case-per-hour-uk-nhs-circumcision-a7564571.html Disgusting! Any culture that thinks this OK is seriously sick. Anyone caught butchering their kids like this should get life. Vile creatures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ez8004 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 (edited) glad you think a subject as serious as this deserves a thumbs up , what next , a smiley face ? It is because your way of thinking is laughable. So breaking your human rights with regards to unwarranted searches is ok? Yes, your way of thinking really does sound this dumb. Edited September 6, 2017 by ez8004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 probably true but very few get checked i suspect due to the cultural sensitivities:roll: This is simply an assumption on your part and entirely without evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Disgusting! Any culture that thinks this OK is seriously sick. Anyone caught butchering their kids like this should get life. Vile creatures I'd settle for a successful prosecution first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 nope not disregarded it at all, its the BBC guardianista article heavily slanting and reporting the few cases where it hadnt happend yet!!!! but was very likely to, for what other reason would a women ask a midwife about FGM? so what about the bbc article from july this year telling us there was more than 5000 newly reported cases http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40491311 so which is right? are they hiding it? or telling us, seems to be a massive gap in my eyes for a couple of months worth. Surely a fake news peddling leftie organisation would be hiding such figures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Not sure what you are trying to say, Mel, but that BBC article is referring to data where the majority are adult immigrants that were mutilated when young girls in their home country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Joining this a bit late, but out of interest, how much difference in terms of violating the children would there be between a visual inspection by a female nurse for FGM, and the cough test by a male doctor for every boy? You can't spot all cases of FGM merely by looking - there may well be physical inspection of girls genitals in a somewhat invasive fashion. I think another difference is that nobody is suggesting targeting groups of boys of particular ethnicities or nationalities with compulsory cough testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimple Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 You can't spot all cases of FGM merely by looking - there may well be physical inspection of girls genitals in a somewhat invasive fashion. I think another difference is that nobody is suggesting targeting groups of boys of particular ethnicities or nationalities with compulsory cough testing. Well they should. Any mutilation genital or otherwise of a child for religious or cultural reasons should be left in the dark ages where it belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Not sure what you are trying to say, Mel, but that BBC article is referring to data where the majority are adult immigrants that were mutilated when young girls in their home country. im trying to say, the same website with two different takes on the same subject, now if there was a leftie conspiracty to soften one lot of results, surely theyd conspire to soften the other too? or did they just forget to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I think another difference is that nobody is suggesting targeting groups of boys of particular ethnicities or nationalities with compulsory cough testing. This is the cultural sensitivities aspect coming in to play that you yourself denied was a factor in stifling investigations into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now