Jump to content

NHS hit by cyberattack


Recommended Posts

Have we discussed here already why we pay for Windows and are beholden to Microsoft when we could use Linux for free and be beholden to nobody?
To an extent.

 

Like it or loathe it, much of the professional healthcare software developed over the last 30-odd years has been developed for a Windows environment, which has been the universal default OS for as long.

 

Embedded Windows (borne from WindowsCE) has long been a standard in the healthcare field (and is no better shielded than XP, if you will recall Stuxnet), e.g. long before the iPad/tablet format took off, 486- and Pentium-based tablet PCs were invented for the healthcare market, with the earliest versions running off Windows CE.

 

Nothing to prevent the (wider) use of Linux/Unix for infrastructural, backend and network management, other than hoisting oneself to the complete mercy of in-house and contracted developer expertise. It's a choice.

 

But your MRI, X-ray, ward/theatre management, <etc.> -driving software (and drivers, APIs, <etc.>) are most likely just about all Windows native, wherein you can either keep (and belt and brace) Windows as a frontline OS, or dump it and re-start from scratch (coding, drivers developing, testing, training <...>), with inevitable healthcare consequences for those patients left in hiatus by the decision and whilst the replacement goes on.

 

You might as well ask why are we beholden to diesel and petrol producers when we could all be driving electric cars ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHS upgrade could also be accomplished by individuals or large companies donating old systems when they upgrade. NHS needs a good system, that doesn't necessarily have to all be the latest newest supercomputers but they do need to be maintained and its safety supervised by qualified staff.

 

Its not the hardware that's the problem - the usual computer refresh is two to three years - I know because I buy ex-NHS Dell and HP computers with the third year warranty still often on them!

 

The issue is probably more to do with the licensing cost of purchasing a newer version of Windows and the software that runs on it not being compatible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.