Jump to content

The" leaders" debate


Recommended Posts

Nope, you seem to be suggesting some Soviet-style rapid nationalisation costing hundreds of billions of quid.

 

The manifesto has not said that would happen so are costing some fantasy that is in your head. Don't be surprised if people fail to indulge your reds under the bed paranoia

 

Wait. (Serious question time)

 

Does a Manifesto not cover what they are going to do in the next parliament, i.e. 5 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, you seem to be suggesting some Soviet-style rapid nationalisation costing hundreds of billions of quid.

 

The manifesto has not said that would happen so you are costing some fantasy that is in your head. Don't be surprised if people fail to indulge your reds under the bed paranoia

 

I've suggested nothing..all I've done is point out what it says in the manifesto and asked how much it'll cost? Is that an unreasonable thing to do?

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 13:57 ----------

 

Wait. (Serious question time)

 

Does a Manifesto not cover what they are going to do in the next parliament, i.e. 5 years?

 

That was my understanding..I think I asked that a few posts ago..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In response to Amber Rudd's goading of Corbyn about the magic money tree, Jeremy Corbyn should've said "Amber knows all about the magic money tree. Hers is a tax haven in the Bahamas."

Hehehe!! If only he had :hihi:

 

Alas Corbyn isn't very quick witted so he didn't :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait. (Serious question time)

 

Does a Manifesto not cover what they are going to do in the next parliament, i.e. 5 years?

 

Yes it does, but you are imagining a very specific implementation to suit your own agenda.

 

I'm realistic enough to know that the implementation of any of it is going to have to acknowledge practicalities, and that those practicalities mean the lazy scare stories that posit the second coming of Trotsky are just plain idiotic.

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 14:29 ----------

 

I've suggested nothing..all I've done is point out what it says in the manifesto and asked how much it'll cost? Is that an unreasonable thing to do?

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 13:57 ----------

 

 

That was my understanding..I think I asked that a few posts ago..

 

Read the manifesto properly then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it does, but you are imagining a very specific implementation to suit your own agenda.

 

I'm realistic enough to know that the implementation of any of it is going to have to acknowledge practicalities, and that those practicalities mean the lazy scare stories that posit the second coming of Trotsky are just plain idiotic.

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 14:29 ----------

 

 

Read the manifesto properly then.

 

Nope. You are the one making assumptions. I'm just going off what the manifesto says and how much that would cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it does, but you are imagining a very specific implementation to suit your own agenda.

 

I'm realistic enough to know that the implementation of any of it is going to have to acknowledge practicalities, and that those practicalities mean the lazy scare stories that posit the second coming of Trotsky are just plain idiotic.

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 14:29 ----------

 

 

Read the manifesto properly then.

 

Which part,relating to nationalisation,do you reckon I haven't read properly? Genuine question.. What do you think the extract I posted above means? (post #145)

Edited by truman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Down in Corbyn's garden there stands a money tree

It's gonna grow a fortune , 'Vote Jez' it all comes free

He wants the votes from schoolkids, they're clued up at sixteen

They'll all be nicely brainwashed, the lefty socialist dream

If you want more education it will come without a fee

There won't be many jobs though, he'll have killed the economy

He's gonna create some 'real' jobs is old wizard Jeremy

Manufacturing flip flops at the fluffy jamboree

Free care for the young, free care for the elderly

Tenner an hour minimum, to reduce the risk of poverty

Equality and fairness go through your ABC

But what about the rest of us, the likes of you and me

We can all go dumping compost round Corbyn's money tree

Edited by Michael_W
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. You are the one making assumptions. I'm just going off what the manifesto says and how much that would cost.

 

No you're not. The manifesto was outlined above and not once does it say that all the services will be nationalised in one go, or be fully nationalised, or what the timescale is, or what the model for nationalisation will be.

 

You are interpreting it how you want which is your prerogative but I'm suggesting you have it wrong because you are arguing it is something very specific when it isn't. It's actually a super flexible set of commitments that any of a wide variety of outcomes could conform to.

 

It's a very clever manifesto. It has you tied in knots trying to shoehorn it into your commie paranoia theories.

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 15:12 ----------

 

Which part,relating to nationalisation,do you reckon I haven't read properly? Genuine question.. What do you think the extract I posted above means? (post #145)

 

All of it by the looks of things. See previous answer to supertramp.

 

You just can't make that mud stick can you. Try harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you're not. The manifesto was outlined above and not once does it say that all the services will be nationalised in one go, or be fully nationalised, or what the timescale is, or what the model for nationalisation will be.

 

You are interpreting it how you want which is your prerogative but I'm suggesting you have it wrong because you are arguing it is something very specific when it isn't. It's actually a super flexible set of commitments that any of a wide variety of outcomes could conform to.

 

It's a very clever manifesto. It has you tied in knots trying to shoehorn it into your commie paranoia theories

 

 

Ohhhhh kay. You are interpreting it, I am just taking it literally.

 

By clever, do you mean full of **** just like all other politicians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you're not. The manifesto was outlined above and not once does it say that all the services will be nationalised in one go, or be fully nationalised, or what the timescale is, or what the model for nationalisation will be.

 

You are interpreting it how you want which is your prerogative but I'm suggesting you have it wrong because you are arguing it is something very specific when it isn't. It's actually a super flexible set of commitments that any of a wide variety of outcomes could conform to.

 

It's a very clever manifesto. It has you tied in knots trying to shoehorn it into your commie paranoia theories.

 

---------- Post added 02-06-2017 at 15:12 ----------

 

 

All of it by the looks of things. See previous answer to supertramp.

 

You just can't make that mud stick can you. Try harder.

 

I'm not trying to make anything stick, I'm just asking questions...So now you're saying the manifesto doesn't relate to the next Parliament?

If,as you say, it's a clever manifesto then how can we trust them to do anything that's in it? It's just a fiction in that case...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.