sgtkate Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 I don't think he is a person. I think he's a bot written by a virgin teenage boy to express Victorian opinions. Perhaps he's penistone999's more liberal ego? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinkman Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Perhaps he's penistone999's more liberal ego? I thought that was Angel Fire...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtkate Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 By the way I'm loving the irony of posting in a 'ladies with class' thread, I don't think I've had class since 1981 and I was born in 83. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil752 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Gosh and thought this thread would just die and not fly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmberLeaf Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Ladies with class go to places with class And that would be.................where? Kentucky McBurger King? Debenham's Ladies Lavatories? ---------- Post added 17-06-2017 at 15:02 ---------- By the way I'm loving the irony of posting in a 'ladies with class' thread, I don't think I've had class since 1981 and I was born in 83. Me too................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliceBB Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) Indeed! I've become quite adept at extrapolating the real meaning of posts from an arbitrary jumble of grammatical faux pas! Nicely put. But who is to say what 'the real meaning' of any utterance/post is? The author, or the reader? Or someone else? ---------- Post added 18-06-2017 at 22:54 ---------- I'm fascinated by the idea that in the 50s and 60s, women (and men) were slimmer, more smartly dressed and elegant. It would certainly seem to be the case if you look at photographs from that period. I don't doubt people were thinner' - any photograph of a crowded beach in the 50s will demonstrate that. You can see most people's ribs. But elegance...I'm not sure.it could be simply that photographers generally only photographed smart, elegant people. Perhaps all the scruffy, poorly dressed people were too busy slaving away earning a crust or doing the laundry or trying to feed their families, to get dressed up for a photograph. Rudeness/swearing - definitely worse, in my (obviously subjective) experience! My mum tells me people smelt a lot sweatier in those days, btw... Edited June 18, 2017 by aliceBB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Probably true about photos, now we all have cameras and probably take as many pictures in a week as I took in an entire year when younger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now