The Consequences of Brexit [part 4]

[Fogey]

No questions to answer, and where are the lies, the only ones are from the remoaners who keep coming out with the childish doom scenarios, time for you to grow up and get a backbone.

 

Im not the one telling lies and refusing to answer questions. Your pants are on fire retep.

Edited March 12, 2018 by Fogey

[ez8004]

Both won by democracy, to the disdain of the losers.

 

So you and your ilk can stop blaming the minority for the government’s car crash like approach to Brexit.

[Litotes]

Both won by democracy, to the disdain of the losers.

 

"The electorate expressed significant support for EC membership, with 67% in favour on a national turnout of 64%. The referendum result was not legally binding, however, it was widely accepted that the vote would be the final say on the matter and would be politically binding on all future Westminster Parliaments."

 

This is about the vote in the 70s, won by a more significant majority than the 2016 one, and to which you are showing disdain.

 

As Davis says - “If a democracy cannot change its mind, it ceases to be a democracy”.

 

It cuts both ways...

 

Time for another referendum.

[El Cid]

Time for another referendum.

 

Our democratically elected Parliament will decide if that is going to happen. It could still happen.

[chalga]

Mrs May called the General Election because there were too many MPs in her own party, who didn't respect the referendum result. Mrs May made a big mistake. A General Election is never a one issue contest like a referendum, which was proven by the result. The UK would be in a much worse position in Brexit negotiations, if the Tories were not the largest party in parliament.

 

She made it an election on Brexit,so according to her,it was all about that issue,or she wouldn't have mentioned a mandate for Brexit.The result was delivered by the Public,not MP's,that is democracy,the referendum was a snapshot in time,so was the election,it shows how people think different things at different times.If she can't get her MP's onside,that just shows how divisive the whole thing is,people are not going to be whipped into,or railroaded against the way they feel,and that also is democracy.

[Lockdoctor]

probably not, there has been no realistic vision presented which we can pull together around.

 

if you can offer some tangible positives then please do so because no one else seems to be able too.

This very thread proves too many remain voters don't want to pull together because they don't respect the referendum result or the wishes of the people who voted to leave the EU.

 

The UK is the 5th largest economy and a rich country. We will still be a rich country whatever the outcome of Brexit negotiations. We are luckier than the people of China, who have had their constitution changed without voting in a referendum, which allows their President to rule for life.

[retep]

Im not the one telling lies and refusing to answer questions. Your pants are on fire retep.

 

Then perhaps you can point to my lies and the questions I refuse to answer.

 

---------- Post added 13-03-2018 at 08:32 ----------

 

"The electorate expressed significant support for EC membership, with 67% in favour on a national turnout of 64%. The referendum result was not legally binding, however, it was widely accepted that the vote would be the final say on the matter and would be politically binding on all future Westminster Parliaments."

 

This is about the vote in the 70s, won by a more significant majority than the 2016 one, and to which you are showing disdain.

 

As Davis says - “If a democracy cannot change its mind, it ceases to be a democracy”.

 

It cuts both ways...

 

Time for another referendum.

 

So why are the remoaners asking for another referendum, the result was accepted in the 70s, I can't remember an outcry like the wimps of today, a majority of one is still a majority.

 

The population were lied to then, the pervert Heath had a lot of questions to answer.

[alchresearch]

So why are the remoaners asking for another referendum, the result was accepted in the 70s, I can't remember an outcry like the wimps of today, a majority of one is still a majority.

 

Because there are far more sources to question and provide evidence to what we've been told than there were back then?

[melthebell]

Then perhaps you can point to my lies and the questions I refuse to answer.

 

---------- Post added 13-03-2018 at 08:32 ----------

 

 

So why are the remoaners asking for another referendum, the result was accepted in the 70s, I can't remember an outcry like the wimps of today, a majority of one is still a majority.

 

The population were lied to then, the pervert Heath had a lot of questions to answer.

and still NOT one of you can actually say what will, or what YOU want to happen, truthfully, its all just slag off the remainers.

[Guest]

and still NOT one of you can actually say what will, or what YOU want to happen, truthfully, its all just slag off the remainers.

 

What we want is for Britain not to be absorbed into a supranational state and to be a normal country that governs itself from within its own borders. Very extremist demand that isn't it?!

 

As for what business wants, are we going to let the tail wag the dog? Business will have to do what it has always done, which is operate in the environment and boundaries it finds itself in.