Jump to content

The Consequences of Brexit [part 4]


Recommended Posts

 

Greg Clark, the Business Secretary, has written to the EU to warn that removing UK encryption technology could delay the project by three years at a cost of around €1 billion.

 

and?

how long will ours be delayed by? since we'd have to start from scratch :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and?

how long will ours be delayed by? since we'd have to start from scratch :huh:

 

Mel, it's not happening. It's a negotiation. S childish negotiation, but nonetheless a negotiation. Slightly worryingly is that France ostensibly is ok with throwing EU security under the bus to pinch a few jobs and techs from the UK. More worryingly some Brits think that this is jolly good because they can't stand the idea of having voted for the losing side in a democratic referendum and having their entitlement bubble pricked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mel, it's not happening. It's a negotiation. S childish negotiation, but nonetheless a negotiation. Slightly worryingly is that France ostensibly is ok with throwing EU security under the bus to pinch a few jobs and techs from the UK. More worryingly some Brits think that this is jolly good because they can't stand the idea of having voted for the losing side in a democratic referendum and having their entitlement bubble pricked.

you made sense and sounded rational until the last couple of sentences where you again resulted to childish insults

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As most of us have heard, new MOT regulations came into effect in the last day or so. The reason being we're still in EU and that's where the new laws have come from.

 

Since we're leaving the Union by March next year, does that mean we're just going to revert back to our old MOT check-list?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and how many billions will that cost einstein?

 

Less than the UK will finish up paying for the EU version dumpling.

 

"Graham Turnock, chief executive of the UK Space Agency, said early feasibility work was under way into a UK system, which he said would cost a "lot less" than Galileo, thanks to work already done and "British know-how and ingenuity".

 

Asked by the BBC's Science Correspondent Jonathan Amos if it could be as much as £5bn, he said "tops".

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43891933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As most of us have heard, new MOT regulations came into effect in the last day or so. The reason being we're still in EU and that's where the new laws have come from.

 

Since we're leaving the Union by March next year, does that mean we're just going to revert back to our old MOT check-list?

 

Thanks.

 

I don't know, but it would fit in with our desire to rush to the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less than the UK will finish up paying for the EU version dumpling.

 

"Graham Turnock, chief executive of the UK Space Agency, said early feasibility work was under way into a UK system, which he said would cost a "lot less" than Galileo, thanks to work already done and "British know-how and ingenuity".

 

Asked by the BBC's Science Correspondent Jonathan Amos if it could be as much as £5bn, he said "tops".

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43891933

so an extra 5bn on top of what weve already paid? what about this cash for the NHS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since we're leaving the Union by March next year, does that mean we're just going to revert back to our old MOT check-list?

 

Hopefully not, the minimum standard to pass an MOT is pretty low already. If you can't maintain a vehicle to these standards or higher, then you don't deserve one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) Let's not have an additional logic failure Truman, I don't intend to prove a negative. It should be simplicity itself to point out the correct predictions of Project Fear MK 1. This discussion has been rehearsed many times here so I don't expect anything new now apart from a plaintiff cry of "but we've not left yet". Roll on next week's emergency budget, economic crash, hoardes of unemployed City workers and of course world war 3.

 

This discussion is remarkable. Assertions without evidence even in direct sight of previous failures of the same arguments.

 

You said "Project fear" was demonstrably wrong.. are you changing your mind now in that it's not demonstrable? Show us why it's wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.