Andbreathe Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 So I guess that you'd prefer taxpayers to fund him, what with you barring his receipt of income? We bankroll worse than the likes of Gad...and the worse do a lot more damage than he could ever dream of doing. I agree with tinfoil...strip him of all assets to a bare minimum. Nasty piece of work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 Nasty, yes, but that's not what the thread concerns. Should people distinguish evil-doing from the evil-doer? ---------- Post added 15-08-2017 at 17:37 ---------- all royalties go to the victims Why the 'all'? As long as each receives an amount of damages set by a Judge in open court, what claim should they have of his other capital and income? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 Nasty, yes, but that's not what the thread concerns. Should people distinguish evil-doing from the evil-doer? ---------- Post added 15-08-2017 at 17:37 ---------- Why the 'all'? As long as each receives an amount of damages set by a Judge in open court, what claim should they have of his other capital and income? This argument is becoming circular and tedious. If people by Gary glitter records or they get played on the radio, Gary glitter gets money - if he has enough to help him cover his tracks he will offend again. Do you want to create a system where Gary glitter is financial,y comfortable? As it stands it's more or less policing itself. After this thread, thank god for that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 If people by Gary glitter records or they get played on the radio, Gary glitter gets money - if he has enough to help him cover his tracks he will offend again. Do you want to create a system where Gary glitter is financial,y comfortable? Do you think that only "financially comfortable" people abuse children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidley Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 the contentious opinion is that he will never get out of jail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 Do you think that only "financially comfortable" people abuse children? Not at all. Money will help though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 Today's Pick of the Pops with Paul Gambachini just skipped over Gary Glitter. I was listening to an episode a while back that had to omit him and Jonathan King. When Cliff was under suspicion they also quickly skipped over some of his songs. Glitter has sneaked through a couple of times though, at Christmas. There was a terrible Jive Bunny song with an excerpt of "Rock N Roll Christmas" by Glitter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 When Cliff was under suspicion they also quickly skipped over some of his songs. Glitter has sneaked through a couple of times though, at Christmas. There was a terrible Jive Bunny song with an excerpt of "Rock N Roll Christmas" by Glitter! Jive Bunny is terrible full stop. That fact is unrelated to Gary Glitter! ---------- Post added 16-08-2017 at 16:59 ---------- if he has enough to help him cover his tracks he will offend again. Really- how do you know this? And when a murderer is released from prison, your view is...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 Jive Bunny is terrible full stop. That fact is unrelated to Gary Glitter! ---------- Post added 16-08-2017 at 16:59 ---------- Really- how do you know this? And when a murderer is released from prison, your view is...? They're more likely to reoffend aren't they? We don't have a murderers register but we do have a sex offenders register. What do you think the reason for that is? I think it depends on the murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 They're more likely to reoffend aren't they? We don't have a murderers register.. I think it depends on the murder. Eh? Do you think that there should be a Murderers' Register? And a Thieves one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now